Malpraktik Pemilu dan Korupsi: Analisis terhadap Proses Penghitungan dan Rekapitulasi pada Pemilu Indonesia 2019

Main Article Content

Luthfi Hamzah Husin
Heroik Mutaqin Pratama
Wegik Prasetyo
Hendra Hendra
Wawan Budi Darmawan
Firman Manan
Feri Amsari


This article attempts to examine the relationship between election malpractice and corruption by focusing on analyzing frauds in the vote counting and recapitulation process in the 2019 Indonesian Election, specifically in the legislative election. This study tries to fill in the gaps in literature that examines electoral malpractice in Indonesia which is seen more at the campaign stage rather than the vote counting and recapitulation stages in which the role of election management body is very central. To analyze this, this study analyses more specifically the involvement of the General Election Commission (KPU) as election organizer in electoral malpractice. Using document analysis and case study method, this study found that the vote recapitulation stage, especially at the district level, is the most prone phase to electoral malpractice where the involvement of the ad-hoc election administrator and candidates’ witness play an important role there.  

Article Details



Allen, N. (2014). From patronage machine to partisan melee: Subnational corruption and the evolution of the Indonesian party system. Pacific Affairs 87 (2): 221-245,

Aspinall, E. (2015). Oligarchic Populism: Prabowo Subianto’s Challenge to Indonesian Democracy. Indonesia 9:1-28.

Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for Sale: Pemilihan Umum, Klientelisme, dan Negara di Indonesia. Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Jakarta.

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2015). Politik uang di Indonesia: Patronase dan klientelisme pada pemilu legislatif 2014. PolGov. Yogyakarta.

Bader, M. (2012). Trends and patterns in in electoral malpractice in post-Soviet Eurasia. Journal of Eurasian Studies 3: 49-57.

Baghdasaryan, V., Iannantuoni, G., Maggian, V. (2018). Electoral fraud and voter turnout: An experimental study. European Journal of Political Economy 58: 203-219,

Black, H. (1968). Black’s Law Dictionary Fifth Edition. West Publishing Co. New York.

Bowler, S., Brunnel, T., Donovan, T., & Gronke, P. (2015). Election administration and perceptions of fair elections. Electoral Studies 38: 1-9,

Bratton, M., Dulani, B., & Masunungure, E. (2016). Detecting manipulation in authoritarian elections: Survey-based methods in Zimbabwe. Electoral Studies 42: 10-21,

Brich, S. (2011a). Electoral Malpractice. Oxford University Press. New York.

__________. (2011b). Briefing Paper: Electoral Corruption. Institute for Democracy & Conflict Resolution.

Casas, A., Diaz, G., & Trindade, A. (2017). Who monitors the monitor? Effect of party observers on electoral outcomes. Journal of Public Economics 145: 136-149,

CNN Indonesia. (2019). Rekapitulasi Suara Pemilu Tingkat Kecamatan Mulai Hari Ini, diakses dari: 15 September 2020.

DKPP RI. (2019). DKPP Berhentikan Ketua dan Anggota KPU Kota Batam, diakses dari: 20 September 2020.

Frank, R. & Coma, F. (2017). How election dynamics shape perceptions of electoral integrity. Electoral Studies 48: 153-165,

Fukuoka, Y. (2013). Oligarchy and Democracy in Post-Soeharto Indonesia. Political Studies Review 11: 52-64,

Hadiz, V. (2001). Capitalism, oligarchic power and the state in Indonesia. Historical Materialism 8(1): 119-151,

Held, D. (2006). Models of Democracy. Polity Press. Cambridge.

Husin, L. & Al Akbar, N. (2019). Beyond the Binary Logic of Populist Articulations in 2019 Indonesian Election: A Post-Structuralist Analysis of ‘Sexy Killers’ Documentary. Central European Journal of International and Security Studies 13(4): 411–431, (2019). Divonis 4 Bulan Karena Ubah Perolehan Suara, Petugas PPK Ini Tak Diketahui. Kompas. 15 September 2020.

Laporan Hasil Pengawasan Pemilu 2019 di Wilayah Kerja KBRI Kuala Lumpur, Nomor: 067/PanwasluLN-KualaLumpur/HK.0101/IV/2019.

Leemann, L. & Bochsler, D. (2014). A systematic approach to study electoral fraud. Electoral Studies 35: 33-47,

Lehoucq, F. (2003). Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and Consequences. Annual Review Political Science Journal 6(1): 233-256,

Magaloni, B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

________________. (2010). The game of electoral fraud and the ousting of authoritarian rule. American Journal of Political Science 54(3): 751-765,

Mietzner, M. (2015a). Reinventing Asian Populism: Jokowi’s Rise, Democracy, and Political Contestation in Indonesia. East-West Center. Honolulu.

________________. (2015b). Dysfunction by design: Political finance and corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies 47(4): 587-610.

________________. (2007c). Party financing in post-Soeharto Indonesia: between state subsidies and political corruption. Contemporary Southeast Asia 29(2): 238-263.

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote Buying in Indonesia: The Mechanics of Electoral Bribery. Palgrave Macmillan. Basingstoke.

________________. (2020). Kuasa Uang: Politik Uang dalam Pemilu Paca-Orde Baru. KPG (Kepustakaan Populer Gramedia). Jakarta.

Neuman, L. (1997). Social Research Methods. Needham Heights: Allyn & Bacon.

Norris, P. (2013a). Does the world agree about standards of electoral integrity? Evidence for the diffusion of global norms. Electoral Studies 32: 576-588,

___________. (2013b). The new research agenda studying electoral integrity. Electoral Studies 32: 563-575,

P Norris. (2014). Why Electoral Integrity Matters. Cambridge University Press. New York.

Ong, E. (2018). Electoral manipulation, opposition power, and institutional change: Contesting for electoral reform in Singapore, Malaysia, and Cambodia. Electoral Studies 54: 159-171,

Orr, G. (2006). Suppressing Vote Buying: the “War” on Electoral Bribery from 1868. The Journal of Legal History, 27 (3): 289-314,

Paskarina, C. (2018). Korupsi Politik dalam Kompetisi Elektoral. Prisma 37(3): 37-50,{8BE884A7-4FCD-5168-10D7-3AD7E7B9CC5D}&bid={3EFE2EA0-2E3F-29AB-4C05-A1CCABEA1516}.

Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Radar Jogja. (2019). Anita Divonis Hukuman Percobaan. Radar jogja. 16 September 2020. (2019). KPU Tidak Hitung Surat Suara Metode Pos di Malaysia. Republika. 16 September 2020.

Schedler, A. (2002). The nested game of democratization by elections, International Political Science Review 23(1): 103-122,

Simpser, A. (2013). Why governments and parties manipulate elections: theory, practice, and implications. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge.

Sjoberg, F. (2016). Bring the Party Back in: Institutional Design for ‘Smart Election Fraud’. Electoral Studies 44: 307-318, (2019). Kronologi Penemuan Surat Suara Tercoblos di Malaysia. Tempo. 16 September 2020. (2019). KPU Ungkap Sebab Rekapitulasi Suara di Kecamatan Butuh Waktu Lama, 15 September 2020.