Skip to main content
About the Journal | Editorial Team | Publication Ethics | Contact
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Home > Issues > Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022) > Analysis of central transfer funds and the probability of corruption at the local government level using the Zero-Inflated Poisson method
RESEARCH ARTICLE Issue: Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022) | Published: 2022-06-30

Analysis of central transfer funds and the probability of corruption at the local government level using the Zero-Inflated Poisson method

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2022)
Aan Dwi Nurcahyo1 , Benedictus Raksaka Mahi2
1 Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK)
2 University of Indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.862
READ / PREVIEW FULLTEXT PDF DOWNLOAD FULLTEXT PDF READ / PREVIEW FULLTEXT PDF (INDONESIAN) DOWNLOAD FULLTEXT PDF (INDONESIAN)
Downloads
1,562
Views
1,078
Citations
14

ABSTRACT

The majority of corruption in the regions in Indonesia is carried out on Regional Budget funds, which the main source of Regional Budget revenue comes from Central Government transfers. Based on the characteristics of their use, transfer funds can be classified into General Purpose Transfers (DTU) and Specific Purpose Transfers (DTK). This study was conducted to see the influence of DTU and DTK on the probability of corruption in the regions. The method used is Zero-Inflated Poisson (ZIP) regression because there is an overdispersion problem and excess zero in the dependent variable. With a sample of 519 Regency and City Governments in Indonesia in the 2010-2019 period, DTU was found to have a positive relationship to the level of corruption. The flexibility in managing the DTU budget is the cause that triggers an increase in corruption in the regions. Meanwhile, DTK shows a negative relationship with the level of corruption. The local government does not have the flexibility to use the DTK budget for other programs, and the supervision in the realization of the DTK program is also tighter.

KEYWORDS

Corruption General Transfer Fund Special Transfer Fund Zero-Inflated Poisson

AUTHORS & AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Aan Dwi Nurcahyo

, Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK)
Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK)

Benedictus Raksaka Mahi

, University of Indonesia
University of Indonesia

REFERENCES

Astuti, Y. D., & Adrison, V. (2019). The audit board of Republic of Indonesia opinion and bribery in local governments in Indonesia. Jurnal Tata Kelola Dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara, 5(2), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v5i2.379 Baskaran, T. (2011). Fiscal decentralization, ideology, and the size of the public sector. European Journal of Political Economy, 27(3), 485–506. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2011.03.003 Fatkuroji, I., & Meilinda, S. D. (2022). Pilihan publik dalam serial kasus korupsi kepala daerah. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.799 Fittriyah, N., Hadi, A. F., & Dewi, Y. S. (2014). Pemodelan jumlah kematian akibat difteri di Provinsi Jawa Timur dengan Regresi Binomial Negatif dan Zero-Inflated Poisson. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, November, 201–214. http://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/psmp/article/view/951 Goel, R. K., & Nelson, M. A. (2011). Towards an idea-centered, principle-base design to as creation approach support learning knowledge. Public Choice, 148(3), 471–490. Hubbard, P. (2008). Putting the power of transparency in context: information’s role in reducing corruption in Uganda’s Education Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal, 136. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1100131 Kotera, G., Okada, K., & Samreth, S. (2012). Government size, democracy, and corruption: An empirical investigation. Economic Modelling, 29(6), 2340–2348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.06.022 Kusuma, W., Komalasari, D., & Hadijati, M. (2013). Model regresi Zero Inflated Poisson pada data overdispersion. Jurnal Matematika, 3(2), 71–85. https://doi.org/10.24843/JMAT.2013.v03.i02.p37 Lessmann, C., & Markwardt, G. (2010). One size fits all? Decentralization, corruption, and the monitoring of bureaucrats. World Development, 38(4), 631–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2009.11.003 Lou, Y.-I., & Wang, M.-L. (2011). Fraud risk factor of the fraud triangle assessing the likelihood of fraudulent financial reporting. Journal of Business & Economics Research (JBER), 7(2), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.19030/jber.v7i2.2262 Maria, E., Halim, A., & Suwardi, E. (2018). Eksplorasi faktor tekanan untuk melakukan fraud di pemerintah daerah Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Publik, 1(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.32554/jap.v1.i1.p111-126 Saputra, B. (1969). Dampak desentralisasi fiskal terhadap korupsi di Indonesia. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 8(3), 251–260. https://doi.org/10.24258/jba.v8i3.92 Sjahrir, B. S., Kis-Katos, K., & Schulze, G. G. (2013). Political budget cycles in Indonesia at the district level. Economics Letters, 120(2), 342–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2013.05.007 Syurmita, S. (2014). Pengaruh karakteristik pemerintah daerah terhadap prediksi financial distress. Konferensi Regional Akuntansi (KRA) Dan Doktoral Kolokium 2014.

LICENSE AND COPYRIGHT

CC BY-SA 4.0

Open Access Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

This work is published open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

HOW TO CITE

Nurcahyo, A. D., & Mahi, B. R. (2022). Analysis of central transfer funds and the probability of corruption at the local government level using the Zero-Inflated Poisson method. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.862

INDEXED BY: