Anticorruption education ecosystems at State Islamic Universities in Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The corruption crisis in Indonesia has reached a dangerous level and must receive attention from all parties, including higher education institutions. Otherwise, it could lead to destruction in Indonesia. Despite focusing merely on describing anticorruption education ecosystems in religious universities, this study is significant for Indonesia's sustainable growth. Hence, this research aims to identify anticorruption education ecosystems at State Islamic Universities (PTKIN) in Indonesia. Using a descriptive quantitative method, the data was collected through a questionnaire with the indicators: (1) anticorruption value-creating networks; (2) a clean and transparent governance system, and (3) collective awareness of the need for a movement to fight corruption (shared logic). The questionnaire was distributed to Vice Rectors II (general administration, planning and finance) and the Heads of the SPI (Internal Supervisory Unit) at PTKIN. The results of this research proved that the characteristics of the educational ecosystem at PTKIN were quite supportive of anticorruption education, with an average score of 3.4833 (score category C). This finding still did not meet community expectations. Therefore, to create a better anticorruption education ecosystem, tighter laws and dedication from PTKIN leadership were required.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Abdul-Jabbar, M., & Kurshan, B. (2015). Educational ecosystems: A trend in urban educational innovation. Perspectives on Urban Education, 12(1), 7–13.
Abdulkareem, M., & Ye-zhuang, T. (2017). The effect of religious beliefs, participation and values on corruption: Survey evidence from Iraq. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.14569/IJACSA.2017.080840
Adner, R. (2012). The wide lens: A new strategy for innovation. NY: Portfolio Penguin.
Akbar, Y. H., & Vujić, V. (2014). Explaining corruption. Cross Cultural Management, 21(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCM-03-2013-0050
Arifin, S. (2015). Model implementasi pendidikan antikorupsi di perguruan tinggi Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keislaman, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.52185/kariman.v3i1.47
Arliman, L. (2017). Konsep dan gagasan pengenalan pendidikan antikorupsi bagi anak dalam rangka mewujudkan generasi yang bebas korupsi. Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v17i1.1348
Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: Implications for innovation management. Oxford Handbook of Innovation Management, September, 204–228. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199694945.013.012
Begovic, B. (2005). Corruption: Concepts, types, causes and consequences. 3(26), 1–9.
Bowser, D. (2001). Corruption; Trust and the danger to democratization in the former Soviet Union.
Corruption Perceptions Index. (2020). Transparency international: The global coalition against corruption.
Dewantara, J. A., Hermawan, Y., Yunus, D., Prasetiyo, W. H., Efriani, E., Arifiyanti, F., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2021). Anticorruption education as an effort to form students with character humanist and law-compliant. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.21831/jc.v18i1.38432
Diansyah, F., Yuntho, E., & Fariz, D. (2011). Penguatan pemberantasan korupsi melalui fungsi koordinasi dan supervisi Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi (KPK). Indonesia Corruption Watch.
Djabbar, F. (2009). Tentang kurikulum antikorupsi.
Duska, R., & Whelan, M. (1982). Perkembangan moral : Perkenalan dengan Piaget dan Kohlberg/ Ronald Duska dan Mariellen Whelan. Yayasan Kanisius.
Elrick, L. E. (2021). The ecosystem concept: a holistic approach to privacy protection. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 35(1), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2020.1784564
Evrensel, A. Y. (2010). Institutional and economic determinants of corruption: A cross-section analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 17(6), 551–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850802297814
Fakhis, A. Z. P., & Taufiqurrohman, AH. A. (2021). Strengthening anticorruption concept to elevate society 5.0. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainable Innovation Track Humanities Education and Social Sciences (ICSIHESS 2021), 224–230. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211227.036
Falkner, K., Vivian, R., & Williams, S.-A. (2018). An ecosystem approach to teacher professional development within computer science. Computer Science Education, 28(4), 303–344. https://doi.org/10.1080/08993408.2018.1522858
Gundogan, M. B., Eby, G., & Yuzer, T. V. (2015). Capturing definitions for a sustainable distance education ecosystem through an online Delphi study (pp. 125–139). https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-6493-7.ch005
Gusnardi. (2014). Pendidikan anti korupsi di perguruan tinggi: Perlukah? Pekbis Jurnal, 6(2), 86–93.
Hakim, L. (2012). Model integrasi pendidikan anti korupsi dalam kurikulum pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam -Ta’lim, 10(2), 141–156.
Hamzah, A. (1984). Korupsi di Indonesia: Masalah dan pemecahannya. Gramedia.
Harto, K. (2014). Pendidikan anti korupsi berbasis agama. 20(1), 121–138.
Hasanah, S. U. (2018). Kebijakan perguruan tinggi dalam menerapkan pendidikan anti korupsi. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.31571/pkn.v2i1.744
Hidayat, A. S. (2019). Pendidikan kampus sebagai media penanaman nilai-nilai antikorupsi bagi mahasiswa. Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar’i, 6(1).
Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2006). The keystone advantage: What the new dynamics of business ecosystems mean for strategy, innovation, and sustainability. Academy of Management Perspectives, 20(2), 88-90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4166241
Iyanda, D. O. (2012). Corruption: Definition, theories & concepts. Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review (OMAN Chapter), 2(4), 37.
Kadir, Y. (2018). Kebijakan pendidikan anti korupsi di perguruan tinggi. Gorontalo Law Review, 1(1), 25–38. https://doi.org/10.32662/golrev.v1i1.95
Karbakhsh, R., & Ahmadi Safa, M. (2020). Basic psychological needs satisfaction, goal orientation, willingness to communicate, self-efficacy, and learning strategy use as predictors of second language achievement: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 49(5), 803–822. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09714-7
Ko, K., & Moon, S.-G. (2014). The relationship between religion and corruption: are the proposed causal links empirically valid? International Review of Public Administration, 19(1), 44–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/12294659.2014.887353
Kozyreva, L. D., Kotov, A. I., Morozova, N. D., Alexandrova, N. V., & Migunova, E. V. (2022). Formation of educational ecosystem as a key priority of the Russian education development strategy. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference Strategy of Development of Regional Ecosystems “Education-Science-Industry” (ISPCR 2021), 208(Ispcr 2021), 251–256. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.220208.036
Kristiono, N. (2018). Penanaman nilai antikoroupsi bagi mahasiswa FIS Unnes melalui mata kuliah pendidikan anti korupsi. Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v9i1.2807
Manurung, R. T. (2012). Pendidikan anti korupsi sebagai satuan pembelajaran berkarakter dan humanistik. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 11(27).
Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Lembaran Negara RI Tahun 2002 No. 137, 1–13.
Perdana, N. S. (2018). Implementasi peranan ekosistem pendidikan dalam penguatan pendidikan karakter peserta didik. Refleksi Edukatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24176/re.v8i2.2358
Porta, D. della. (2000). Social capital, beliefs in government, and political corruption. Disaffected Democracies (pp. 202–228). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691186849-013
Prasetyo, D., Muharam, R. S., & Sembada, A. D. (2021). Integrasi pendidikan antikorupsi dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.25273/citizenship.v9i2.8385
Seligson, M. A. (2002). The impact of corruption on regime legitimacy: A comparative study of four Latin American countries. The Journal of Politics, 64(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00132
Suacana, W. G. (2004). Pendidikan antikorupsi di perguruan tinggi. https://Wgsuacana.Files.Wordpress.Com.
Subkhan, E. (2020). Pendidikan antikorupsi perspektif pedagogi kritis. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(1).
Sukarjo. (2006). Kumpulan materi evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurusan Teknologi Pembelajaran Program Pascasarjana UNY.
Sumaryati. (2020). Penguatan pendidikan antikorupsi perspektif essensialisme. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 06(1), 1–14.
Suryani, I. (2013). Penanaman nilai-nilai anti korupsi di lmbaga pendidikan perguruan tinggi sebagai upaya preventif pencegahan korupsi. Jurnal Visi Komunikasi, 12(2), 306–323.
Tansley, A., G. (1935). The use and abuse of vegetational concepts and terms author. Ecology, 16(3), 284–307.
Umam, A. K. (2014). Islam, korupsi dan good governance di negara-negara Islam. Jurnal Al-Ahkam, 24(2), 195. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2014.24.2.146
Vaknin, S. (2009). Financial crime and corruption 3rd edition (L. Rangelovska, Ed.). A Narcissus Publications Imprint.
Valk, V. der, & Arnold G. (2014). From formation to ecosystem: Tansley’s response to clements’ climax. Journal of the History of Biology, 47, 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-013-9363-y