ARTIKEL PENELITIAN
Edisi: Vol 11 No 2 (2025)
| Rilis: 2025-12-21
The gratification paradox: Teacher innovation in urban and rural anti-corruption education
1
Politeknik Negeri Manado
2
Komunitas Peduli Pendidikan dan Budaya Antikorupsi (KOMPI PBAK) Sulawesi Utara
3
Forum Penyuluh Antikorupsi (FPAK) Sulawesi Utara
Unduhan
233
Tampilan
362
Sitasi
31
ABSTRAK
Corruption remains a systemic challenge in Indonesia, yet Anti-Corruption Education (PAK) often fails due to a one-size-fits-all approach. This paper addresses this gap by comparing the implementation of PAK in different urban and regency contexts to inform more effective and contextual strategies. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, this study surveyed 244 educators in Bitung City and North Bolaang Mongondow Regency. Findings reveal a "Dichotomy of Barriers": urban areas face "software" (environmental) challenges, while rural areas face "hardware" (resource) limitations, leading to different forms of "organic innovation." Most significantly, this research uncovers a "Gratification Paradox," where a high cognitive understanding of gratification coexists with widespread denial of its practice, rooted in a conflict between legal norms and the cultural tradition of gift-giving. This article demonstrates the limitations of purely cognitive-based PAK and encourages a fundamental shift towards context-sensitive policies and dilemma-based pedagogy to build deep ethical reasoning.
KATA KUNCI
Pendidikan Antikorupsi
Paradoks Gratifikasi
Pedagogi Berbasis Dilema
Implementasi Kontekstual
Inovasi Guru
Anti-Corruption Education
Gratification Paradox
Dilemma-Based Pedagogy
Contextual Implementation
Teacher Innovation
TIM PENULIS & BIOGRAFI PENULIS
Politeknik Negeri Manado, Manado, Indonesia
Erryl Davy Lumintang
, Komunitas Peduli Pendidikan dan Budaya Antikorupsi (KOMPI PBAK) Sulawesi UtaraKomunitas Peduli Pendidikan dan Budaya Antikorupsi (KOMPI PBAK) Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
Abdul Haris Kai
, Forum Penyuluh Antikorupsi (FPAK) Sulawesi UtaraForum Penyuluh Antikorupsi (FPAK) Sulawesi Utara, Indonesia
DAFTAR PUSTAKA (REFERENCES)
Andersen, H., & Mayerl, J. (2019). Responding to socially desirable and undesirable topics: Different types of response behaviour? Methods, Data, Analyses, 13, 29 Pages. https://doi.org/10.12758/MDA.2018.06
Angraeni, S. (2024). Collective action management of anticorruption education (ACE) from an organizational sociology perspective: A proposed institutional strategy for ACE. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 10(2), 269–284. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v10i2.1365
Asmayawati, Yufiarti, & Yetti, E. (2024). Pedagogical innovation and curricular adaptation in enhancing digital literacy: A local wisdom approach for sustainable development in Indonesia context. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 10(1), 100233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100233
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Caspari-Gnann, I., & Sevian, H. (2022). Teacher dilemmas as sources of change and development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 112, 103629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103629
Chang, M. C., Shaeffer, S., Al-Samarrai, S., Ragatz, A. B., De Ree, J., & Stevenson, R. (2014). Teacher reform in Indonesia: The role of politics and evidence in policy making. Washington, DC: World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-9829-6
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Third edition). Sage.
Dahyanti, N., Diastami, S. M., Humaira, A., & Darmansah, T. (2024). Analisis kebijakan dalam mengatasi problematika pendidikan untuk meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan di Indonesia. Hikmah : Jurnal Studi Pendidikan Agama Islam, 2(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.61132/hikmah.v2i1.545
Eck, K., & Lanigan, A. (2024). Doing reflexivity. Qualitative and multi-method research, 22(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.11506741
Furqon, M. I. (2024). Membangun budaya antigratifikasi (1st ed.). Penerbit Serat. https://perpustakaan.kpk.go.id/index.php?h=show_detail&id=12067
Hambali, G. (2020). Evaluasi program pendidikan antikorupsi dalam pembelajaran. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 06(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.621
Indonesia, P. P. (2021, August 31). Peraturan pemerintah nomor 94 tahun 2021 tentang disiplin pegawai negeri sipil. Setneg. http://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/177031/pp-no-94-tahun-2021
KPK. (2025a). Sinambung misi di tengah transisi: Laporan tahunan KPK 2024 (p. 235) [Annual Report]. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi-data/laporan/laporan-tahunan
KPK. (2025b). Survei penilaian integritas (SPI) pendidikan 2024 (p. 159) [Survey Results]. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/pengumuman/pengumuman-lainnya/survei-penilaian-integritas-spi-pendidikan-2024
KPK. (2025c, April 26). Temuan hasil SPI pendidikan 2024: Gratifikasi masih membayangi ruang kelas [News]. Berita KPK. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/ruang-informasi/berita/temuan-hasil-spi-pendidikan-2024-gratifikasi-masih-membayangi-ruang-kelas
Mansfield, C. F., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016
OECD & ADB (Eds.). (2015). Education in Indonesia: Rising to the challenge. OECD Publishing.
Parahita, B. N., Sangka, K. B., Nurcahyono, O. H., Nurhaini, L., Kurniawati, E. M., Perwitasari, D., Nurrahmawati, A., Probohudono, A. N., & Endiramurti, S. R. (2022). Optimalisasi TPACK melalui insersi video pembelajaran berbasis pendidikan anti korupsi pada mata pelajaran sosiologi. DEDIKASI: Community Service Reports, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20961/dedikasi.v4i2.62372
Prabowo, H. Y., & Cooper, K. (2016). Re-understanding corruption in the Indonesian public sector through three behavioral lenses. Journal of Financial Crime, 23(4), 1028–1062. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-08-2015-0039
Priestley, M., Biesta, G. J. J., & Robinson, S. (2018). Teacher agency: An ecological approach (Reprinted). Bloomsbury Academic, an imprint of Bloomsbury Publishing, Plc.
Rosikah, C. D., & Listianingsih, D. M. (2019). Pendidikan antikorupsi: Kajian antikorupsi, teori dan praktik.
Siregar, A. A., & Chastanti, I. (2022). Implementasi pendidikan antikorupsi di sekolah. Sosial Horizon: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 9(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.31571/sosial.v9i1.1799
Subkhan, E. (2020). Pendidikan antikorupsi perspektif pedagogi kritis. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 06(1), 15–30. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.649
Tintingon, J. Y., Lumapow, H. R., & Rotty, V. N. J. (2023). Problematika dan perubahan kebijakan Pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 9(2), 798–809. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v9i2.5088
Transparency International (Ed.). (2025). Corruption Perceptions Index 2024. Transparency International.
Warburton, E. (2024). Private power and public office: The rise of business politicians in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 56(2), 184–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2024.2334069
Wardani, N. F. K., Sunardi, S., & Suharno, S. (2020). Context-based thematic teaching materials to improve elementary students’ learning achievements. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 193. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.22822
Wibawa, D. S., Agustian, M., & Warmiyati, M. T. (2021). Pendidikan anti korupsi sebagai tindakan preventif perilaku koruptif. Muqoddima Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Riset Sosiologi, 2(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.47776/MJPRS.002.01.01
Widiartana, G., & Setyawan, V. P. (2020). Urgensi pendidikan antikorupsi terhadap pencegahan korupsi dalam pendidikan dasar. Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia, 6(2), 173–189. https://doi.org/10.35194/jhmj.v6i2.1352
Wika, M. (2025). Antara komitmen dan realita: Studi kualitatif terhadap kebijakan pemerataan pendidikan di wilayah terpencil Merauke. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i1.376
Yahya, A. H., & Sukmayadi, V. (2020). A review of cognitive dissonance theory and its relevance to current social issues. MIMBAR : Jurnal Sosial Dan Pembangunan, 36(2), 480–488. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v36i2.6652
LISENSI DAN HAK CIPTA
Lisensi Terbuka Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)
Karya jurnal ini dipublikasikan secara terbuka untuk publik dan dilindungi di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
CARA MENGUTIP (HOW TO CITE)
Lintong, O., Lumintang, E. D., & Kai, A. H. (2025). The gratification paradox: Teacher innovation in urban and rural anti-corruption education. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 11(2), 243-254. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1555
