Biometrics and the ecology of corruption: A posthuman study of the E-KTP Scandal

Fitrilya Anjarsari; Estiningtyas Sholikhah

doi:10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1586

ARTIKEL PENELITIAN Edisi: Vol 11 No 2 (2025) | Rilis: 2025-12-21

Biometrics and the ecology of corruption: A posthuman study of the E-KTP Scandal

Fitrilya Anjarsari¹ , Estiningtyas Sholikhah²

¹ Universitas Diponegoro

² Universitas Muhammadiyah Brebes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1586

BACA / PREVIEW FULLTEXT PDF (INGGRIS) UNDUH FULLTEXT PDF (INGGRIS)

Unduhan

163

Tampilan

172

Sitasi

24

ABSTRAK

This article analyzes Indonesia’s e-KTP electronic ID corruption scandal as a critical test case for digital citizenship in a corruption-prone, postcolonial democracy. Drawing on a qualitative case study of court verdicts, procurement documents, official reports, and investigative journalism, it reconstructs how biometric devices, databases, procurement contracts, party networks, and legal loopholes became tightly coupled in ways that enabled large-scale fraud. Adopting a posthumanist perspective, the study understands corruption not only as the moral failure of individual officials but as an emergent effect of a sociotechnical assemblage in which human actors, code, hardware, and rules co-produce opportunities for rent-seeking. In dialogue with human-in-the-loop approaches to digital governance, the article shows that placing humans at key decision points does little to prevent abuse when those humans are embedded in predatory political and business arrangements. The analysis argues that the e-KTP case exposes the fragility of technological promises that frame biometric identification as a neutral instrument of efficiency, transparency, and security. Instead, the scandal demonstrates how digital infrastructures can be colonized by existing patronage and capital interests unless they are designed and governed with explicit attention to power, accountability, and data justice. By bringing corruption studies into conversation with critical posthumanist thought, the article offers a framework for evaluating future identity and e-government projects in Indonesia and comparable settings.

KATA KUNCI

Posthumanism transhumanism digital citizenship corruption assemblage

TIM PENULIS & BIOGRAFI PENULIS

Fitrilya Anjarsari

, Universitas Diponegoro ORCID

Fitrilya Anjarsari merupakan dosen di Fakultas Ilmu Budaya, Universitas Diponegoro. Dia juga seorang kandidat doktor di Universitas Gadjah Mada

Estiningtyas Sholikhah

, Universitas Muhammadiyah Brebes

English Education Study Program, Universitas Muhammadiyah Brebes, Indonesia

DAFTAR PUSTAKA (REFERENCES)

Anisa, A., & Nugraha, I. (2024). Kualitas pelayanan publik dalam pembuatan KTP elektronik di Kecamatan Banjar Kabupaten Pandeglang. TUTURAN: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi, Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.47861/tuturan.v2i1.780 Astuti, V., & Sari, R. C. (2019). “Bystander effect” in cases of corruption in corporate, bureaucratic and political orders. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 8(3), 420. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.8.3.2019.420-438 Bhandari, A. (2020). Political property rights: Essays on economic opportunity under selective rule of law. Columbia University. Braidotti, R. (2019). Posthuman knowledge (Vol. 2). Polity Press Cambridge. Burr, J., & Fox, N. J. (2023). The more-than-human micropolitics of the dissection assemblage: What can a ‘dead’ body do? Body & Society, 29(3), 55–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X231189458 Burrell, J., Singh, R., & Davison, P. (2024). Keywords of the datafied state. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4734250 de Kalaf, E. H., & Fernandes, K. (2023). Digital identity: Emerging trends, debates and controversies. University of London. https://sas-space.sas.ac.uk/9783/ Gelb, A., & Metz, A. D. (2018). Identification revolution: Can digital ID be harnessed for development? Brookings Institution Press. Haraway, D. J. (2020). Staying with the trouble: Making kin in the Chthulucene. Duke University Press. Liani, I. (2024). Analisis hukum kasus korupsi E-Ktp: Modus operandi dan taktik korupsi yang terungkap. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(24.2). http://www.jurnal.peneliti.net/index.php/JIWP/article/view/9303 Manurung, E. D., Sembiring, S. N. R., & Sulistyani, W. (2019). Pelayanan publik berbasis elektronik dan perilaku anti korupsi. Veritas et Justitia, 5(2), 399–420. Maria, E., & Halim, A. (2021). E-government dan korupsi: Studi di pemerintah daerah, indonesia dari perspektif teori keagenan. EKUITAS (Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan), 5(1), 40–58. https://ejournal.stiesia.ac.id/ekuitas/article/view/4789 Matheus, R., Faber, R., Ismagilova, E., & Janssen, M. (2023). Digital transparency and the usefulness for open government. International Journal of Information Management, 73, 102690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102690 Pohan, K. N. K., Apasha, R., Hanindita, K. A., & Fatkhuri, F. (2025). Dampak sosial dan politik kasus korupsi E-KTP Setya Novanto terhadap kepercayaan publik pada e-government di Indonesia. Jurnal ISO: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik Dan Humaniora, 5(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.53697/iso.v5i1.2596 Razzano, G. (2022). Leap 4.0: African perspectives on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. South African Journal of International Affairs, 29(1), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220461.2022.2043776 Riskasari, R., & Ibrahim, M. (2025). Digitalization of certificate issuance as an effort to minimize corruption in public services. KnE Social Sciences, 10(18), 1327–1347. Setyobudi, C. R., & Setyaningrum, D. (2019). E-government and corruption perception index: a cross-country study. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing Indonesia, 23(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.20885/jaai.vol23.iss1.art2 Solihin, I. (2020). Corruption as an entrepreneurship phenomenon: The case of the electronic identity card (EKTP) in Indonesia. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(2), 3418–3422. https://doi.org/10.61841/rg9nrs91 Syifa, T. (2017). Kualitas pelayanan publik dalam pembuatan e-KTP di Kabupaten Tangerang. Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 4(2), 112–123. Tangkilisan, W., Saragih, B. R., Budi, H. S., & Supriadi, T. (2021). Inconsistency of misusing electronic identity card (E-KTP) data in general elections in Indonesia. Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Iberoamericana y Teoría Social, 1, 182–194. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=7809943 Taylor, C. A. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In C. A. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman Research Practices in Education (pp. 5–24). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137453082_2 Weitzberg, K., Cheesman, M., Martin, A., & Schoemaker, E. (2021). Between surveillance and recognition: Rethinking digital identity in aid. Big Data & Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211006744 Yeung, K. (2018). Algorithmic regulation: A critical interrogation. Regulation & Governance, 12(4), 505–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158 Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

LISENSI DAN HAK CIPTA

Lisensi Terbuka Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Karya jurnal ini dipublikasikan secara terbuka untuk publik dan dilindungi di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CARA MENGUTIP (HOW TO CITE)

Anjarsari, F., & Sholikhah, E. (2025). Biometrics and the ecology of corruption: A posthuman study of the E-KTP Scandal. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 11(2), 283-294. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1586