Skip to main content
Home > Issues > Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026) > Organizational silence and barriers to early corruption detection: A qualitative study of local governments in North Sulawesi
RESEARCH ARTICLE Issue: Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026) | Published: 2026-06-24

Organizational silence and barriers to early corruption detection: A qualitative study of local governments in North Sulawesi

1 Universitas Negeri Manado
2 Universitas Negeri Manado
Downloads
120
Views
211
Citations
25

ABSTRACT

North Sulawesi's Enforcement and Early Corruption Detection Score Index declined from 80,63  (on a 0-100 scale) in 2024 to 65,94 in 2025, nearly twice the national drop, despite a compliance score of 98,63 out of 100 in public services. This integrity paradox signals a decoupling between administrative performance and accountability. Prior studies have examined political capture, organizational silence, and digital governance failures separately; none has mapped their coupling within a local government context. This study investigates the tripartite interrelationship among silence culture, elite political intervention, and digital accountability instrument degradation as the primary explanation for declining early detection capacity within North Sulawesi’s local government oversight system. A qualitative case study was conducted across the Provincial Government of North Sulawesi and City Governments of Manado, Bitung, and Tomohon. Data was collected through interviews, document analysis, and ATLAS.ti thematic coding, analyzed through Principal-Agent Theory, Institutional Theory, and Organizational Silence Theory. Findings reveal a self-reinforcing cycle: elite political intervention hollows out digital instruments including I-Mut /Siladen and the Whistleblowing System; degradation deepens organizational silence; and entrenched silence shields elite intervention from oversight. Minahasan values of Si Tou Timou Tumou Tou and Mapalus, though co-opted to rationalize silence, carry latent normative resources for reform. This study recommends strengthening APIP independence, mandating fiscal allocation for oversight, consolidating whistleblowing platforms, enforcing merit-based sanctions, and reappropriating local wisdom.  

KEYWORDS

Organizational Silence Early Corruption Detection Political Capture Internal Oversight Principal-Agent Theory Bureaucratic Integrity

AUTHORS & AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Brain Fransisco Supit

, Universitas Negeri Manado

Universitas Negeri Manado, Minahasa, Indonesia

Jeane Mantiri

, Universitas Negeri Manado

Universitas Negeri Manado, Minahasa, Indonesia

REFERENCES

Ahmadian, S., Astrabeh, S., & Ejrami, M. (2023). Organizational silence, organizational trust, and organizational commitment. Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Business (Jhssb), 3(1), 112–124. https://doi.org/10.55047/jhssb.v3i1.817 Andarge, T., & Lichtenberg, E. (2020). Regulatory compliance under enforcement gaps. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 57(3), 181–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-020-09405-0 Aulia, S., & Maksum, I. R. (2022). Reformasi kelembagaan unit pengawas internal: Mengatasi desentralisasi korupsi. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.jiap.2022.008.01.1 Dwiyanto, A. (2018). Manajemen pelayanan publik: peduli inklusif dan kolaborasi. UGM press. Gayo, R. P., & Marbun, M. (2024). Efektivitas pengawasan administratif dalam pencegahan korupsi di sektor publik. Indonesia Journal of Business Law, 3(2), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.47709/ijbl.v3i2.4547 Gibbons, A. F. (2025). Epistocracy and the problem of political capture. Public Affairs Quarterly, 39(1), 19–42. https://doi.org/10.5406/21520542.39.1.02 Graycar, A. (2022). Corrupt procurement: rethinking the roles of principals and agents. Policy Design and Practice, 5(3), 276–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2022.2113461 Ismail, A., Nelson, F. M., & Wibowo, B. R. (2025). Abuse of power: Understanding the dynamics of corruption by Indonesian government authorities. Lex Localis - Journal of Local Self-Government, 23(10), 595–604. https://doi.org/10.52152/800756 Lane, J.-E. (2020). The principal–agent approach and public administration. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1462 Malik, K. J., & Prasojo, E. (2023). Determinant factors in the implementation of merit system: An overview of Indonesian case. Asian Journal of Social and Humanities, 2(03), 1942–1952. https://doi.org/10.59888/ajosh.v2i03.187 Noer, H. H. (2025). Patologi kelembagaan demokrasi elektoral: Korupsi politik di Indonesia pasca-reformasi. AEGIS : Journal of International Relations, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.33021/aegis.v9i1.6285 Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2019). Getting the basic nature of systemic corruption right: A reply to Marquette and Peiffer. Governance, 32(4), 799–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12403 Pranoto, E., & Ayu, R. O. (2024). Revitalisasi Aparat Pengawas Intern Pemerintah (APIP) untuk mewujudkan pemerintahan yang bebas dari penyalahgunaan wewenang. Konferensi Nasional Asosiasi Pengajar Hukum Tata Negara Dan Hukum Administrasi Negara, 2(1), 283–308. https://doi.org/10.55292/11cjb836 Prasojo, E. (2023). Isu-isu kontemporer kebijakan dan governansi publik di Indonesia. Prenada Media. Pratiwi, T. D., Salman, R., & Ristawati, R. (2025). Perlindungan hukum Aparatur Sipil Negara sebagai saksi pengadu (whistleblower) terhadap dugaan pelanggaran kode etik. Cakrawala, 19(1), 23–33. https://doi.org/10.32781/cakrawala.v19i1.753 Pujileksono, S., & Siregar, M. (2022). Pemahaman korupsi dalam teori pilihan rasional dan hubungan prinsipal-agen. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 2(2), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.30742/juispol.v2i2.2592 Rahman, F., Wantu, F. M., & Abdussamad, Z. (2026). Merit-based civil service management: A rule of law perspective. Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision, 6(1), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.55885/jprsp.v6i1.808 Riwanto, A., & Suryaningsih, S. (2024). Strategi pencegahan korupsi pemerintah daerah guna mewujudkan tata kelola pemerintahan daerah yang baik. Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2024.v9.i1.p1-20 Saragih, R., & Kuntadi, C. (2023). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi kapabilitas APIP: kompetensi, pengalaman audit dan dukungan manajemen. Jurnal Manajemen, Akuntansi Dan Logistik (JUMATI), 1(1), 144–153. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v2i1.2033 Scott, W. R. (2017). Institutional theory: Onward and upward. The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 900, 853–871. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446280669.n34 SPI KPK. (2026). Laporan SPI KPK 2025. Supeno, E., Hariani, N. J., Soegiono, A. N., Hendratmi, A., Santoso, F. B. A., & Farrel, M. (2025). What’s behind digital governance? Uncovering corruption loopholes in e-procurement in East Java. Integritas Jurnal Antikorupsi, 11(2), 227. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1493 Susilo, W. D., Angraeni, S., & Partohap, T. H. (2019). Survei penilaian integritas: Alternatif pengukuran kinerja pemberantasan korupsi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 5(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v5i2.478 Tampubolon, P., Panggabean, M. L., & Tampubolon, M. (2024). Kajian kriminologi korupsi di sektor publik di Indonesia. Berajah Journal, 4(2), 211–234. https://doi.org/10.47353/bj.v4i2.303 Yusoff, M. S., Othman, I. W., & Mohd Kamal, H. I. (2023). Corruption as a cultural phenomenon? Analyzing corruption issues in economics, politics, education and the public sector. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12), 1025–1052. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/19931

LICENSE AND COPYRIGHT

Open Access Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

This work is published open-access and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

HOW TO CITE

Supit, B. F., & Mantiri, J. (2026). Organizational silence and barriers to early corruption detection: A qualitative study of local governments in North Sulawesi. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 12(1), 115-130. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v12i1.1692

INDEXED BY: