Beralih ke bagian utama
Tentang Jurnal | Editorial Team | Etika Publikasi | Kontak
Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi
Beranda > Terbitan > Vol 11 No 2 (2025) > What’s behind digital governance? Uncovering corruption loopholes in e-procurement in East Java
ARTIKEL PENELITIAN Edisi: Vol 11 No 2 (2025) | Rilis: 2025-12-21

What’s behind digital governance? Uncovering corruption loopholes in e-procurement in East Java

Vol 11 No 2 (2025)
Eko Supeno1 , Nurul Jamila Hariani2 , Agie Nugroho Soegiono3 , Achsania Hendratmi4 , Filidyo Bramanta Adi Santoso5 , Muhammad Farrel6
1 Universitas Airlangga
2 Universitas Airlangga
3 Universitas Airlangga
4 Universitas Airlangga
5 Universitas Airlangga
6 Universitas Airlangga
DOI: https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1493
BACA / PREVIEW FULLTEXT PDF (INGGRIS) UNDUH FULLTEXT PDF (INGGRIS)
Unduhan
324
Tampilan
393
Sitasi
28

ABSTRAK

Despite the growing presence of digital governance in Indonesia's public procurement system, corruption remains widespread. This study critically examines the limits of electronic procurement (e-procurement) as an anti-corruption instrument, with a focus on procurement processes in East Java Province. This study uses secondary data from the Corruption Eradication Commission's (KPK) Corruption Prevention Integrity Survey (SPI), as well as qualitative insights from focus group discussions (FGDs), in-depth interviews, and direct observations, to demonstrate that digitalization alone does not eliminate procurement corruption. The findings highlight pseudo transparency, in which procurement players exploit regulatory gaps notwithstanding electronic surveillance. Corruption is most frequent in areas with large procurement expenditures, inadequate supervision, and minimal public watchdog participation. The continued presence of favoritism, collusion, and selective vendor nominations, demonstrates that e-procurement may improve procedural transparency but fails to address underlying structural concerns. The study emphasizes the importance of independent supervision systems and leadership commitment to enhancing procurement integrity. By highlighting existing weaknesses in digital procurement systems, this study contributes to policy discussion about increasing governance integrity. It advocates for a resilient anti-corruption ecosystem that includes institutional reforms, increased enforcement, and civil society engagement, in addition to technology solutions.

KATA KUNCI

Corruption E-procurement Digital Governance East Java

TIM PENULIS & BIOGRAFI PENULIS

Eko Supeno

, Universitas Airlangga

Airlangga Institute for Learning and Growth, Indonesia

Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Nurul Jamila Hariani

, Universitas Airlangga

Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Agie Nugroho Soegiono

, Universitas Airlangga

Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Achsania Hendratmi

, Universitas Airlangga

Departemen Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Filidyo Bramanta Adi Santoso

, Universitas Airlangga

Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

Muhammad Farrel

, Universitas Airlangga

Departemen Administrasi Publik, Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Airlangga, Indonesia

DAFTAR PUSTAKA (REFERENCES)

Amalia, N. R., Alfan, M. A., Aliefia, N. M., Radzi, N. M. S. N. B. M., & Kurniawan, N. F. (2023). Digitalization of the public procurement system in Indonesia: challenges and problems. Yuridika, 38(3), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v38i3.51874 Azmi, I. F., & Nugroho, A. A. (2023). Anti-corruption system 4.0: The adoption of blockchain technology in the public sector. Integritas Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9(1), 93–108. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v9i1.985 Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. SAGE Publishing Ltd. Castleberry, A., & Nolen, A. (2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019 Chapman, D. W., & Lindner, S. (2014). Degrees of integrity: the threat of corruption in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 247–268. Farikhoh, I., & Chariri, A. (2022). A bibliometric analysis of corruption in the public sector. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 63–76. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.866 Heeks, R. (1998). Information technology and public sector corruption. Development in Practice, 8(1), 10-18. Indonesian Corruption Watch (2023). Tren penindakan kasus korupsi tahun 2023. Diakses pada 20 Agustus 2024 dari https://antikorupsi.org/id/tren-penindakan-kasus-korupsi-tahun-2023 jaga.id (n.d). Survei penilaian integritas. Diakses pada 17 Maret 2025 pada https://jaga.id/jendela-pencegahan/spi?vnk=ea53faef Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. (2022). Keputusan Kepala LKPP Nomor 122 Tahun 2022 tentang tata cara penyelenggaraan katalog elektronik. Jakarta: Lembaga Kebijakan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Mungiu-Pippidi, A. (2015). The quest for good governance: How societies develop control of corruption. Cambridge University Press Novitaningrum, B. D. (2024). The role of e-procurement in promoting government transparency: Lessons from Surabaya. Economic Military and Geographically Business Review, 2(1), 59-72. https://doi.org/10.61511/emagrap.v2i1.2024.971 Okiri, F. O., Ngugi, L. W., & Wandayi, J. O. (2019). Strengthening integrity & preventing corruption in the judiciary in Kenya. Beijing Law Review, 10(01), 131–152. Pemerintah Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 16 Tahun 2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2018 Nomor 33. Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 54 Tahun 2010 tentang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta: Sekretariat Negara. Prabowo, H. Y. (2014). To be corrupt or not to be corrupt: Understanding the behavioral side of corruption in Indonesia. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 306-326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2013-0045 Rose-Ackerman, S. (2012). Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform. Cambridge University Press Rose-Ackerman, S., & Palifka, B. J. (2016). Corruption and government: causes, consequences, and reform: Second Edition. Cambridge University Press Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust: An experimental approach. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349 Ryder, N., & Pasculli, L. (2020). Corruption, integrity and the law. Routledge Saldaña, J. (2021). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (4th ed.). SAGE Publishing Ltd. Saptono, P. B., & Purwanto, D. (2022). Factors causing the ineffectiveness of Good Corporate Governance in preventing Corruption in State-Owned Enterprises. Integritas Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.870 Suardi, I., Hilda Rossieta, Chaerul Djakman & Vera Diyanty. (2024). Procurement governance in reducing corruption in the indonesian public sector: a mixed method approach. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2393744 Sumantri, I. (2023). Transparansi dalam pemerintahan: Tinjauan kegagalan pencegahan korupsi di Indonesia. Journal of Scientech Research and Development, 5(1), 97–109. https://doi.org/10.56670/jsrd.v5i1.110 Tracy, S. J. (2019). Qualitative research methods: collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact (2nd ed.). Wiley-Blackwell. Transparency International (2024). Corruption perceptions index. Diakses pada 20 Maret 2025 dari https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2023 Wahyuningsih, N., Wulansari, N. A., Ariyati, Pratama, W. N., & Pinandita, M. K. (2023). E-procurement in preventing fraud in the procurement of government goods and services at Semarang State University. Journal of Public Administration and Government, 5(2), 227-238. https://doi.org/10.22487/jpag.v5i2.921 Wicaksono, A. P., Urumsah D., & Faishal A. (2017). The implementation of e-procurement system: indonesia evidence. SHS Web of Conferences, 34, 10004. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20173410004

LISENSI DAN HAK CIPTA

CC BY-SA 4.0

Lisensi Terbuka Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY-SA 4.0)

Karya jurnal ini dipublikasikan secara terbuka untuk publik dan dilindungi di bawah lisensi Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

CARA MENGUTIP (HOW TO CITE)

Supeno, E., Hariani, N. J., Soegiono, A. N., Hendratmi, A., Santoso, F. B. A., & Farrel, M. (2025). What’s behind digital governance? Uncovering corruption loopholes in e-procurement in East Java. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 11(2), 227-242. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v11i2.1493

TERINDEKS OLEH: