Moderating the effect of procurement governance on corruption through e-procurement
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
E-procurement has become an obligation in the Indonesian government. However, its implementation has not been maximized. E-procurement can provide opportunities for corruption due to weak procurement governance. This study examines how governance based on government regulations and global recommendations can reduce corruption during the planning, preparation, and implementation phases of procurement. This study also examines the influence and role of e-procurement in strengthening the influence of procurement governance in reducing corruption from the perception of system users. This study collected primary data by distributing questionnaires to the ministries, institutions, provincial governments, and suppliers. The Smartpls Structural Equation Model (SEM) was used to test the hypotheses. The results prove that procurement governance has a significant impact on procurement corruption. These results imply that the principles of efficiency, capacity, competition, and monitoring and control are strongly correlated with procurement governance. In addition, corruption is most likely to occur in the procurement preparation stage. The test results also show that e-procurement is not directly significant in reducing corruption, but can strengthen the influence of governance on corruption.
Downloads
Article Details
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
Adebayo, V. O., & Evans, R. D. (2015, November). Adoption of e-procurement systems in developing countries: A Nigerian public sector perspective. In 2015 2nd International Conference on Knowledge-Based Engineering and Innovation (KBEI) (pp. 20-25). IEEE.
Arief, H. A. A., Saptawati, G. P., & Asnar, Y. D. W. (2016, October). Fraud detection based-on data mining on Indonesian E-Procurement System (SPSE). In 2016 International Conference on Data and Software Engineering (ICoDSE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
Arifin, Z. (2017). Tindak pidana korupsi dalam proses pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Jurnal Hukum Responsif, 5(5), 54-63.
Boateng, A., Wang, Y., Ntim, C. G., & Elmagrhi, M. (2024). Institutions and corruption relationship: Evidence from African countries. Journal of International Management, 30(3), 101136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2024.101136
BPKP. (2019). Peraturan No 3 tentang Pengawasan Pengadaan Barang Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta: BPKP.
BPKP. (2021). Prinsip keterbukaan informasi atas pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Retrieved from BPKP: https://www.bpkp.go.id/sesma/berita/read/30430/40/Prinsip-Keterbukaan-Informasi-atas-Pengadaan-Barang-dan-Jasa-Pemerintah.bpkp
Chaitongrat, T., Leungbootnak, N., Kusonkhum, W., Deewong, W., Liwthaisong, S., & Srinavin, K. (2019, October). Measurement model of good governance in government procurement. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 639, No. 1, p. 012024). IOP Publishing.
Chen, L. D., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: an extended technology acceptance perspective. Information & management, 39(8), 705-719.
Faisal, M., Utama, S., Sari, D., & Rosid, A. (2023). Languages and conforming tax avoidance: The roles of corruption and public governance. Cogent Business & Management, 10(3), 2254017. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2254017
Faisol, I. A., Tarjo, T., & Musyarofah, S. (2014). Pengaruh penerapan e-procurement terhadap pencegahan fraud di sektor publik. Journal of Auditing, Finance, and Forensic Accounting, 2(2), 71-90.
Hair, J. F. (2011). Multivariate data analysis: An overview. International encyclopedia of statistical science, 904-907.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European business review, 31(1), 2-24.
Hair Jr, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., Sarstedt, M., Danks, N. P., & Ray, S. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) using R: A workbook (p. 197). Springer Nature.
Hardy, C. A., & Williams, S. P. (2008). E-government policy and practice: A theoretical and empirical exploration of public e-procurement. Government Information Quarterly, 25(2), 155-180.
ICW (2018). Rekomendasi sistem pengadaan barang dan jasa RI. Mengawal Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa di Indonesia (pp. 16-24). Jakarta: Hivos.
IDFI. (2020). Report of transparent public procurement rating. Georgia: IDFI.
Instruksi Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2016). Instruksi Presiden No 10 tahun 2016. Jakarta.
Transparency International. (2006). Curbing corruption in public procurement handbook. Berlin: Transparency International.
Transparency International. (2014). Curbing corruption in public procurement a practical guide. Berlin.
Transparency International. (2019). Transparency International. Retrieved from http://www.transparency.org
Transparency International. (2023). Corruption perception index of Indonesia. 2023: Transparency International.
Kang, S., Kim, D., & Kim, G. (2023). Corporate entertainment expenses and corruption in public procurement. Journal of Asian Economics, 84, 101554.
Khorana, S., Ferguson‐Boucher, K., & Kerr, W. A. (2015). Governance Issues in the EU's e‐Procurement Framework. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(2), 292-310.
KNKG. (2008). Pedoman umum good public governance Indonesia. Jakarta.
KPK. (2017, April 18). Tantangan governansi dalam menyelesaikan masalah korupsi di sektor publik & sektor swasta. https://www.kpk.go.id/id/publikasi/kajian-dan-penelitian/papers-antikorupsi/488-tantangan-governansi-dalam-menyelesaikan-masalah-korupsi-di-sektor-publik-sektor-swasta
KPK. (2021). Laporan tahunan. Jakarta: KPK.
KPK. (2023). Survey penilaian integritas. Jakarta: KPK.
Lio, M. C., Liu, M. C., & Ou, Y. P. (2011). Can the internet reduce corruption? A cross-country study based on dynamic panel data models. Government information quarterly, 28(1), 47-53.
Lisciandra, M., Milani, R., & Millemaci, E. (2022). A corruption risk indicator for public procurement. European Journal of Political Economy, 73, 102141.
LKPP. (2018). Peraturan LKPP. Jakarta: LKPP.
LKPP. (2023). Keputusan kepala LKPP tentang penetapan dokumen rencana percepatan transformasi digital di bidang pengadaan barang/jasa pemerintah. Jakarta: LKPP.
Mai, R., Niemand, T., & Kraus, S. (2021). A tailored-fit model evaluation strategy for better decisions about structural equation models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121142.
Maytandi, A., & Abbas, M. H. I. (2020). Does e-procurement prevent corrupt activity in public procurement process. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Bisnis (JPEB), 8(2), 143-153.
Mchopa, A. D. (2020). Applicability of force account approach in procurement of works in Tanzania. Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law, 6(2), 137-143.
Mélon, L., & Spruk, R. (2020). The impact of e-procurement on institutional quality. Journal of Public Procurement, 20(4), 333-375.
Mohd-Rashid, R., Mehmood, W., Ooi, C. A., Che Man, S. Z., & Ong, C. Z. (2023). Strengthened rule of law to reduce corruption: evidence from Asia-Pacific countries. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 26(5), 989-1006.
Nandankar, S., & Sachan, A. (2020). Electronic procurement adoption, usage and performance: a literature review. Journal of Science and Technology Policy Management, 11(4), 515-535.
Neupane, A., Soar, J., & Vaidya, K. (2012). The potential of e-procurement technology for reducing corruption. International Journal of Information Technology and Management, 11(4), 273-287.
Nodehi, T., Zutshi, A., Grilo, A., & Rizvanovic, B. (2022). EBDF: The enterprise blockchain design framework and its application to an e-Procurement ecosystem. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 171, 108360.
Ntemi, W. D., & Mbamba, U. O. (2016). The relationship between electronic readiness and corruption reduction: Countrywide data analysis. Cogent Business and Management, 3 (1), 1–14.
OECD. (2014). Good practices for integrity in public procurement.
OECD. (2016). Preventing corruption public procurement.
OECD. (2016). Recommendation on Public Procurement.
Okafor, O. N., Adebisi, F. A., Opara, M., & Okafor, C. B. (2020). Deployment of whistleblowing as an accountability mechanism to curb corruption and fraud in a developing democracy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 33(6), 1335-1366. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-12-2018-3780.
OPM & CIPFA. (2004). The good governance standard for public services. Hackney Press.
Owusu, E. K., Chan, A. P., & Ameyaw, E. (2019). Toward a cleaner project procurement: Evaluation of construction projects’ vulnerability to corruption in developing countries. Journal of cleaner production, 216, 394-407.
Peltier-Rivest, D. (2018). A model for preventing corruption. Journal of Financial Crime, 25(2), 545-561.
Peraturan Presiden. (2018). Pengadaan barang dan jasa pemerintah. Jakarta.
Peraturan Presiden. (2018). Sistem pemerintahan berbasis elektronik. Jakarta.
Peraturan Presiden. (2018). Strategi nasional pencegahan korupsi. Jakarta.
Peraturan Presiden. (2021). Perubahan atas Perpres 16/2018 tentang Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Pemerintah. Jakarta.
Prihanto, H., Murwaningsari, E., Umar, H., & Mayangsari, S. (2020). How Indonesia Attempts to Prevent Corruption. Oceanide, 12(2), 70-85.
Sarstedt, M., Hair Jr, J. F., Cheah, J. H., Becker, J. M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). How to specify, estimate, and validate higher-order constructs in PLS-SEM. Australasian marketing journal, 27(3), 197-211.
Setiani, N., Huda, S. N., Pulungan, R., & Winarko, E. (2017, March). Transformation of fraud activities in procurement system in Indonesia. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 185, No. 1, p. 012005). IOP Publishing.
Susiani, I. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan e-procurement terhadap pencegahan fraud di sektor publik (Studi pada SKPD Pemerintah Kota Bandar Lampung (Doctoral dissertation, Tesis. IIB Darmajaya).
Titl, V., De Witte, K., & Geys, B. (2021). Political donations, public procurement and government efficiency. World Development, 148, 105666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105666
UNCAC. (2013). Guidebook on anti-corruption in public procurement and the management of public finances. Vienna: United Nations.
UNODC. (2013). Good practices in ensuring compliance on UN convention against corruption. 2013: UN.
UNODC. (2020, December 8). Public procurement reform Indonesia. Retrieved from UNODC: https://www.unodc.org/southeastasiaandpacific/en/what-we-do/anti-corruption/topics/2020/public-procurement-reform-indonesia.html
Utami, D., & Haliah, A. I. (2020). The effects of e-procurement implementation and integrityto fraud prevention against the government procurement of goods/services fraud with intention as the moderating variable on the government of Makassar City. Journal of Research in Business and Management, 11-20.
WorldBank. (2018). World Governance Indicator. Retrieved from World Governance Indicator: https://info.worldbank.org/governance/wgi/
Xinli, H. (2015). Effectiveness of information technology in reducing corruption in China: a validation of the DeLone and McLean information systems success model. The Electronic Library, 33(1), 52-64.
Yazdani, A., Hilbrecht, M., Imbeau, D., Bigelow, P., Neumann, W. P., Pagell, M., & Wells, R. (2018). Integration of musculoskeletal disorders prevention into management systems: a qualitative study of key informants’ perspectives. Safety science, 104, 110-118.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2018.01.004
Zahra, F., Abdullah, M. I., Kahar, A., Din, M., & Nurfalah, N. (2021). Preventing procurement fraud in e-purchasing for Indonesian local governments. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(2), 505-511.