Justice based corruption eradication policy: A comparison between Indonesia and Denmark
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
: This research was conducted to obtain an explanation of corruption eradication policies in Denmark and Indonesia. In addition, to find out the justice-based corruption eradication policy in a comparative study of Indonesia and Denmark. This research uses a normative juridical method with a literature study. Based on this, the required results are that corruption eradication policies in Indonesia and Denmark have significant differences. Denmark inserts corruption eradication provisions into each of its laws and regulations and uses a strict element of transparency in state financial management. Denmark utilizes social sanctions supported by the legal culture of its highly law-abiding society. Second, the policy reconstruction that can be used in Indonesia to eradicate corruption adopts the Danish policy. Namely, the anti-corruption agency with independent status integrates corruption eradication regulations into national legislation emphasizing strict sanctions and transparency of state financial management correlated with the wealth of state officials. The independence of the Corruption Eradication Commission is crucial. Applying Denmark’s mechanisms could lead to a breakthrough in corruption eradication in Indonesia.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Anggoro, S. A. (2019). Politik Hukum : Mencari Sejumlah Penjelasan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 10(1), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v10i1.2871
Anita Anita. (2022). Politik Hukum Dalam Penegakan Hukum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Program Magister Hukum FHUI, 2(1), 321–334. https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisyaAvailableat:https://scholarhub.ui.ac.id/dharmasisya/vol1/iss4/36
Armia, M. S. (2022). Penentuan Metode dan Pendekatan Penelitian Hukum. LEMBAGA KAJIAN KONSTITUSI INDONESIA.
Bulu, N. A. (2022). Interpretasi Kasus Korupsi Jenis Trading in Influence Berdasarkan Perspektif Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 6(2), 3447–3458. https://journal.upy.ac.id/index.php/pkn/article/download/3445/pdf/8336
Carothers, C. (2022). The Rise and Fall of Anti-Corruption in North Korea. Journal of East Asian Studies, 22(1), 147–168. https://doi.org/10.1017/jea.2021.38
Chronowski, N., Varju, M., Bárd, P., & Sulyok, G. (2019). Hungary: Constitutional (R)evolution or Regression? In National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6_31
Drugda, S. (2019). Lack of Transparency in Selection of the Danish Ombudsman : Old Habits Die Hard. The International Journal of Constitutional Law. chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://static-curis.ku.dk/portal/files/231472607/iconnectblog.com_Lack_of_Transparency_in_Selection_of_the_Danish_Ombudsman_Old_Habits_Die_Hard.pdf
Fajar Pradnyana, I. M., & Parsa, I. W. (2021). Kewenangan BPK dan BPKP dalam Menentukan Kerugian Keuangan Negara pada Perkara Korupsi. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal), 10(2), 344. https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i02.p11
Fariz, D. (2020). Pembatasan Hak Bagi Mantan Terpidana Korupsi Menjadi Calon Kepala Daerah. Jurnal Konstitusi, 17(2), 309. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1724
Fikri, Sultoni; Hadi, S. (2020). Ombudsman : Studi Perbandingan Hukum Antara Indonesia Dengan Denmark. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(1), 1–12. https://repo.unsrat.ac.id/id/eprint/4569
Handayani, Sri;Wardani, Retna, D. (2022). Tindak Lanjut Penuntasan Kasus Korupsi Mendiang Presiden Soeharto Dalam Rangka Mewujudkan Cita-Cita Reformasi. Jurnal Kajian Hukum, 7(1), 103–115. https://kajianhukum.janabadra.ac.id/index.php/kh/article/download/9/8
Helfer, Laurence R; Rose, C. (2023). Flexible Institution Building In The International Anti-Corruption Regime:Proposing A Transnational Asset Recovery Mechanism. The American Journal of International Law, 117(4), 559–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.32
Hutomo, P., & Soge, M. M. (2021). Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum Dalam Pembaharuan Pengaturan Sistem Pemasyarakatan Militer. Legacy: Jurnal Hukum Dan Perundang-Undangan, 1(1), 46–68. https://doi.org/10.21274/legacy.2021.1.1.46-68
Isnaeni, B. (2021). Trias Politica dan Implikasinya dalam Struktur Kelembagaan Negara dalam UUD 1945 Pasca Amandemen. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum, 6(2), 78. https://doi.org/10.36722/jmih.v6i2.839
Kariadi. (2020). JUSTISI [2020] Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong 99 Kekuasaan Kehakiman Dalam Undang – Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 “Saat Ini Dan Esok.” Jurnal Justisi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong, 6(1), 1–9.
Karunia, A. A. (2022). Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Korupsi Di Indonesia Dalam Perspektif Teori. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 10(1), 1–17. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/hpe/article/view/62831/pdf
Kesiranon, K. (2023). Scrutinize the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC). Journal of Contemporary Sociological Issues, 3(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.19184/csi.v3i2.27775
Kusuma, R. (2022). Perbandingan Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Indonesia Dengan Lembaga Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi …. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 7(1), 71–83. https://ejournal.unib.ac.id/ubelaj/article/view/12554%0Ahttps://ejournal.unib.ac.id/ubelaj/article/download/12554/11370
Lutfi, A. (2017). Reformasi Penegakan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Progresif. Jurnal Yuridis, 4(2), 148–163. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35586/.v4i2.244.
Maerani, I. A., & Nuridin, N. (2021). Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Hukum Pelaksanaan Pidana Denda Berbasis Nilai-Nilai Islam. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 148–163. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/pandecta/article/view/29658
Magdalena, Y., Gultom, L., Adrison, V., & Arya, R. (2023). Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi State capture , grand corruption , petty corruption dan hubungannya dengan investasi di Indonesia. 9(2), 157–170.
Mahfuz, A. L. (2020). Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Politik Hukum Dalam Suatu Pembentukan Undang-Undang. Jurnal Kepastian Hukum Dan Keadilan, 1(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.32502/khdk.v1i1.2442
Maolani, D. Y., Kusmayadi, D. A., Hermawan, D., & Maida, A. W. S. (2021). Sulitkah Korupsi Diberantas: Motif Afiliasi Dan Kekuasaan. Jurnal Dialektika: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 19(3), 96–105. https://doi.org/10.54783/dialektika.v19i3.20
Marzuki, P. M. (2019). Penelitian Hukum. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Muhaimin. (2020). Metode Penelitian Hukum. Mataram University Press.
Pabalik, D., Hatta, M., Hidaya, N., Bima, M. R., & Djanggih, H. (2020). Characteristic of criminal acts. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 24(08), 2596–2608. https://doi.org/10.37200/IJPR/V24I8/PR280279
Pahlevi, F. (2022). Pemberantasan Korupsi di Indonesia Perspektif Legal System Lawrence M. Freidmen. El-Dusturie, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.21154/eldusturie.v1i1.4097
Ruhenda, R., Heldi, H., Mustapa, H., & Septiadi, M. A. (2020). Tinjauan Trias Politika Terhadap Terbentuknya Sistem Politik dan Pemerintahan di Indonesia. Journal of Governance and Social Policy, 1(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.24815/gaspol.v1i2.18221
Sakinah, A. R. (2019). Perbandingan Implementasi Konsep Scandinavian Model of Welfare State dan Opini Publik Swedia dan Finlandia dalam Menghadapi Krisis Pengungsi Eropa Tahun 2015-2017. Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Universitas Airlangga, 53(9), 1–19. https://repository.unair.ac.id/83945/5/JURNAL_Fis.HI.37 19 Sak p.pdf
Salter, M., & Mason, J. (2007). Writing Law Dissertations. 257. https://www.dawsonera.com/abstract/9781405898867
Sampe, S. (2022). Perbandingan Sistem Pemerintahan. In Patra Media Grafindo (Vol. 13, Issue 1). https://repo.unsrat.ac.id/id/eprint/4569
Satria, H. S. (2020). Kebijakan kriminal pencegahan korupsi pelayanan publik. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.660
Seregig, I. K. (2018). Motives of Criminal Acts of Corruption In Indonesia (Study of Decision Number: 52/Pid.Sus-TPK/2016/PN.Tjk). Yustisia, 7(2), 228–246. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/yustisia/article/view/21834/16970
Setiyono, S., Supartono, S., Keumala, D., & Bakri, K. (2023). Rekonstruksi Kebijakan Terhadap Penetapan Saksi Pelaku Yang Bekerjasama Pada Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Aspek Kepastian Hukum Dan Aspek Kemanfaatan Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Terpadu. Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti, I(September), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18280
Tondatuon, K. A. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Mengenai Trading In Influence Sebagai Sebuah Tindak Pidana Dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Lex Crimen, X(11). https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/v3/index.php/lexcrimen/article/view/38403/35045
Vadenbring, J. (2023). Collective Identities , Integration and Resistance during the Scanian War. October. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.36699.75047