Sistem Pengawasan Dana Otonomi Khusus Aceh dan Dampaknya terhadap Pemberantasan Korupsi

Main Article Content

Khairil Akbar
Zahlul Pasha Karim
Nyak Fadlullah
Muhammad Siddiq Armia

Abstract

DOKA is the biggest source of corruption that has driven distric heads in Aceh to prison. This fact raises the question, how has the DOKA monitoring system been carried out and what is the impact on corruption eradication? This study aims to explain the DOKA monitoring system and its impact on corruption eradication. The theory used is the theory of Check and Balances and the theory of Willingness & Oppurtunity. This research is classified into qualitative research with descriptive analysis techniques. The main findings of the study indicate that DOKA is not being taken seriously. This can be seen in the absence of a special supervision system and the normal supervision system for DOKA is not optimal. In addition, there is no special institution that oversees the implementation of DOKA. Such a supervisory system has no impact on corruption eradication. It needs serious improvement and a comprehensive evaluation of the use and distribution of DOKA for the realization of social welfare in Aceh.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Aceh, B. (2019). Profil Kemiskinan dan Ketimpangan Pengeluaran Penduduk Aceh September 2019 (Issue 04).

Anti-Corruption Clearing House. (2017). Abdullah Puteh. https://acch.kpk.go.id/id/jejak-kasus/115-abdullah-puteh

Aspinall, E. (2009). Combatants to Contractors: The Political Economy of Peace In Aceh. Indonesia.

Barron Patrick. (n.d.). The Contested Corners of Asia: Subnational Con!ict and International Development Assistance The Case of Aceh, Indonesia. The Asia Fondation, 82.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s Money: A study of the social psychology of embezzlement. Free Press. Glencoe, IL.

Dwi Bowo Rahardjo. (2019). KPK Sebut Enam Provinsi di Indonesia Ini Juara Korupsi. Suarajawatengah.Id. https://jateng.suara.com/read/2019/04/10/212117/kpk-sebut-enam-provinsi-di-indonesia-ini-juara-korupsi.

Dwi Hadya Jayani. (2019). Bagaimana Perkembangan Dana Otonomi Khusus untuk Papua dan Aceh?. Kata Data. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2019/08/20/bagaimana-perkembangan-dana-otonomi-khusus-untuk-papua-dan-aceh#.

Haryono Umar. (2012). Pengawasan Untuk Pemberantasan Korupsi. Jurnal Akuntansi & Auditing 8(2): 110.

Heru Cahyono. (2012). Evaluasi Atas Pelaksanaan Otonomi Khusus Aceh: Gagal Menyejahterakan Rakyat Dan Sarat Konflik Internal. Jurnal Penelitian Politik 9(2): 2. http://ejournal.politik.lipi.go.id/index.php/jpp/article/view/227/101

Hidayat, Reja. (2019). Pembubaran TP4 Kejaksaan: Menolak Evaluasi, Menutup Kasus Lama. Tirto.id.

https://tirto.id/pembubaran-tp4-kejaksaan-menolak-evaluasi-menutup-kasus-lama-enzG. 27 September 2020.

Hidayat, Syarief. (2018). Jangan Hanya Andalkan KPK. Universitas Indonesia. https://fh.uii.ac.id/blog/2018/07/05/jangan-hanya-andalkan-kpk-oleh-syarif-hidayat-s-h-m-hum/. 27 September 2020.

Huberman, M. (1984). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Source Book of New Methods. SAGE Publications.

Kemenkeu. (2020). Kajian Efektivitas Implementasi Dana Otonomi Khusus.

Kementerian Keuangan. (n.d.). Bagaimana Pemanfaatan Dana Otonomi Khusus. Kemenkeu. http://www.djpk.kemenkeu.go.id/?ufaq=bagaimana-pemanfaatan-dana-otsus.

Masyarakat Transparansi Aceh. (2020). Daftar Kasus Indikasi Korupsi di Aceh. MATA. https://mataaceh.org/daftar-kasus-indikasi-korupsi-di-aceh/. 8 Desember 2020.

_______________________________________.(2020). Kasus Korupsi di Aceh Mangkrak, MaTA Sudah Minta Disupervisi KPK. MATA. https://mataaceh.org/kasus-korupsi-di-aceh-mangkrak/. 8 Desember 2020.

Nashih Nashrullah. (2020). BPS: Aceh Masih Jadi Provinsi Termiskin se-Sumatra. Republika.Co.Id. https://republika.co.id/berita/q45fpv320/bps-aceh-masih-jadi-provinsi-termiskin-sesumatra.

Pryanka, Adinda. (2018). Pengawasan Lemah Jadi Faktor Pemicu Korupsi Dana Otsus. Republika. https://republika.co.id/berita/nasional/hukum/18/07/06/pbg5q4430-pengawasan-lemah-jadi-faktor-pemicu-korupsi-dana-otsus. 27 September 2020.

Rabi’u Abdullahi dan Noorhayati Mansor. (2015). Fraud Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond Theory. Understanding the Convergent and Divergent for Future Research. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, Volume 5(4): 39.

Siregar, S. N. (2012). Pergeserann Masalah Keamanan di Aceh. Jurnal Penelitian Politik 9(2).

Suharyo. (2016). Otonomi Khusus Papua dan Aceh sebagai Perwujudan Implementasi Peranan Hukum dalam Kesejahteraan Masyarakat. Jurnal Rechstvinding (Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional) 5(3): 323–337.

___________. (2018a). Otonomi Khusus di Aceh dan Papua di Tengah Fenomena Korupsi, Suatu Strategi Penindakan Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18(3): 306.

____________. (2018b). Otonomi Khusus di Aceh dan Papua di Tengah Fenomena Korupsi, Suatu Strategi Penindakan Hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 18(3): 305. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2018.v18.305-318.

Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2006 tentang Pemerintahan Aceh.

Wahid, Ahmad Bil. (2019). Dirjen Kemenkeu Jelaskan Pengawasan DOKA di Sidang Staf Irwandi. Detik.com. https://news.detik.com/berita/d-4433766/dirjen-kemenkeu-jelaskan-pengawasan-doka-di-sidang-staf-irwandi. 27 September 2020.