Perception of college students on civic and anti-corruption education: Importance and relevance
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Corruption is an extraordinary crime that requires extra effort to deal with. KPK takes extra steps in dealing with corrupt behavior, namely by taking preventive actions through educational institutions. In higher education, KPK collaborates with related stakeholders to implement anti-corruption education for college students. This study explores the initial perception of college students toward civic and anti-corruption education. Qualitative with a case study approach has been used as the method of this study. The findings show that the majority of college students perceive that civic and anti-corruption education is very important to study and relevant to the condition of the nation currently.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Amozurrutia, J. A., & Servós, C. M. (2011). Excel spreadsheet as a tool for social narrative analysis. Quality & Quantity, 45(4), 953–967. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-010-9406-9
Arif, D. B., Aulia, S. S., Supriyadi, S., & Asmorojati, A. W. (2019). Panduan insersi pendidikan antikorupsi dalam mata kuliah pendidikan kewarganegaraan. Komisi Pemberantasan Korupsi.
Baskarada, S. (2014). Qualitative case study guidelines. The Qualitative Report, 19(40), 1–25.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 652–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206
Crowe, S., Cresswell, K., Robertson, A., Huby, G., Avery, A., & Sheikh, A. (2011). The case study approach. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11(1), 100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-11-100
Cuga, C. (2018). Civic education as vehicle of multicultural education in building democratic citizen. Proceedings of the Annual Civic Education Conference (ACEC 2018). https://doi.org/10.2991/acec-18.2018.40
Dridi, M. (2013). Corruption and economic growth: the transmission channels. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4(4), 121–152.
Etikan, I. (2017). Sampling and sampling methods. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.15406/bbij.2017.05.00149
Glaeser, E. L., & Saks, R. E. (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics, 90(6–7), 1053–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2005.08.007
Halimah, L., Fajar, A., & Hidayah, Y. (2021). Pendidikan anti korupsi melalui mata kuliah Pancasila: tingkatan dalam memahami kejujuran. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.31571/pkn.v5i1.2561
Hambali, G. (2020). Evaluasi program pendidikan antikorupsi dalam pembelajaran. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(1), 31–44. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.621
Isra, S., Yuliandri, Amsari, F., & Tegnan, H. (2017). Obstruction of justice in the effort to eradicate corruption in Indonesia. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 51, 72–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2017.07.001
Jamieson, K. H. (2013). The challenges facing civic education in the 21st century. Daedalus, 142(2), 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_a_00204
Komara, E. (2017). Curriculum and civic education teaching in Indonesia. EDUCARE, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.2121/edu-ijes.v10i1.929
Kubbe, I., & Engelbert, A. (2018). Corruption and the impact of democracy. Crime, Law and Social Change, 70(2), 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-017-9732-0
Levinson, M. L. (2014). Citizenship and civic education. In D. C. Phillips (Ed.), Encyclopedia of educational theory and philosophy. SAGE. https://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:12701475
Li, H., Kuang, X., & Liang, M. (2020). The changes in Hong Kong students’ perceptions of the ‘good citizen’: Implications for implementing civic education curriculum. Educational Studies, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2020.1852072
Li, Q., & An, L. (2020). Corruption takes away happiness: Evidence from a cross-national study. Journal of Happiness Studies, 21(2), 485–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-019-00092-z
Maiyaki, A. A. (2010). The effects of corruption on the Nigerian economy. IBA Business Review, 5(2).
McAlister, A., Lee, D., Ehlert, K., Kajfez, R., Faber, C., & Kennedy, M. (2017). Qualitative coding: An approach to assess inter-rater reliability. 2017 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--28777
McGuirk, P. M., & O’Neill, P. (2016). Using questionnaires in qualitative human geography. In I. Hay (Ed.), Qualitative Research Methods in Human Geography. Oxford University Press.
Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. (2015). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia nomor 44 tahun 2015 tentang standar nasional pendidikan tinggi (No. 44).
Menteri Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. (2018). Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia Nomor 50 tahun 2018 tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Riset, Teknologi, dan Pendidikan Tinggi Nomor 44 Tahun 2015 tentang Standar Nasional Pendidikan Tinggi.
Mietzner, M. (2015). Dysfunction by design: Political finance and corruption in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 47(4), 587–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2015.1079991
Nurdin, E. S. (2015). The policies on civic education in developing national character in indonesia. International Education Studies, 8(8), 405–411. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v8n8p199
Prabowo, H. Y. (2014). To be corrupt or not to be corrupt. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 17(3), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-11-2013-0045
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2012). Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 55 Tahun 2012 tentang Strategi Nasional Pencegahan dan Pemberantasan Korupsi Jangka Panjang Tahun 2012-2025 dan Jangka Menengah Tahun 2012-2014.
Republik Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945. Sekretariat Jenderal MPR RI.
Rinenggo, A., Kusumawati, I., Stiyawan, Z., & Sutiyono, S. (2022). Anti-corruption education in the family, community, school, and state. Academy of Education Journal, 13(1), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.47200/aoej.v13i1.975
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2010). Essentials of organizational behavior (11th ed.). Pearson Education Inc.
Rothstein, B. (2010). Corruption, happiness, social trust and the welfare state: A causal mechanisms approach (2010:09; Working Papers 2010:09). https://hdl.handle.net/2077/39057
Rothstein, B., & Eek, D. (2009). Political corruption and social trust. Rationality and Society, 21(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349
Simons, H. (2009). Case study research in practice. SAGE publications.
Tay, L., Herian, M. N., & Diener, E. (2014). Detrimental effects of corruption and subjective well-being. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 751–759. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550614528544
Thomas, G. (2011). A typology for the case study in social science following a review of definition, discourse, and structure. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409884
Transparency International. (2021). Corruption perception index. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org
Ugur, M., & Dasgupta, N. (2011). Evidence on the economic growth impacts of corruption in low-income countries and beyond: a systematic review. EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2002 Tentang Komisi Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 3 Tahun 2002 tentang Pertahanan Negara.
Yoldaş, Ö. B. (2015). Civic education and learning democracy: Their importance for political participation of young people. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174, 544–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.703