Participatory budgeting: Lessons for Indonesia

Main Article Content

Ruth Silvia
Achmad Lutfi

Abstract

Some countries have enjoyed the adoption of Participatory Budgeting (PB) with real impact. In Brazil, Participatory Budgeting increases local revenues; in New York there is a change in budget allocation based on demand; whilst in the Czech Republic, Participatory Budgeting has succeeded in increasing the number of general election participants. Participatory Budgeting has created opportunities for citizens to be involved, educated and empowered. It helps increase transparency and has the potential to reduce government inefficiency and corruption. However, participatory budgeting in Indonesia encounters problems regarding the low participation rate amongst people with low incomes, making it only a formality. This study was conducted in order to see how Indonesia may take lessons from the experiences of other countries in the world that have implemented Participatory Budgeting.  It can be concluded that the level of public participation in the Participatory Budgeting process is a key factor in learning from the implementation of Participatory Budgeting in countries across America, Europe, Asia and Africa. By increasing the role of Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), we may find that community political awareness and involvement in Participatory Budgeting is encouraged.

Article Details

How to Cite
Silvia, R., & Lutfi, A. . (2022). Participatory budgeting: Lessons for Indonesia. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(1), 113–122. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v8i1.902
Section
Articles

References

Bednarska-Olejniczak, D., & Olejniczak, J. (2017). Participatory budgeting in Poland–finance and marketing selected issues. Hradec Economic Days, January, 55–67. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/87659/

Blair, H. (2020). Accountability through participatory budgeting in India: Only in Kerala? In S. Cheema (Ed.), Advances in 21st Century Human Settlements (pp. 57–76). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2973-3_3

Cabannes, Y. (2004). Participatory budgeting: conceptual framework and analysis of its contribution to urban governance and the millenium development goals. Un-Habitat.

Chowdhury, T. A., Das, A. B., Chakraborty, L., & Barai, M. K. (2020). NGOs for development: experience of Bangladesh. In M. K. Barai (Ed.), Bangladesh’s Economic and Social Progress (pp. 351–380). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1683-2_12

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. (2015). The new public service. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315709765

Hagelskamp, C., Silliman, R., B. Godfrey, E., & Schleifer, D. (2020). Shifting priorities: participatory budgeting in New York City is associated with increased investments in schools, street and traffic improvements, and public housing. New Political Science, 42(2), 171–196. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2020.1773689

Halvorsen, K. E. (2003). Assessing the effects of public participation. Public Administration Review, 63(5), 535–543. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6210.00317

Ibrahim, A. A. A. M. (2012). Guidelines for applying budgeting as a tool for participatory democracy in Egypt. In M. Pacetti & G. Passerini (Eds.), Sustainable City 2022 (pp. 255–266). https://doi.org/10.2495/SC120221

Knobloch, K. R., Barthel, M. L., & Gastil, J. (2020). Emanating effects: The impact of the Oregon citizens’ initiative review on voters’ political efficacy. Political Studies, 68(2), 426–445. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321719852254

Kukučková, S., & Bakoš, E. (2019). Does participatory budgeting bolster voter turnout in elections ? The case of the Czech Republic. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0016

Madej, M. (2019). Participatory budgeting in the major cities in Poland – Case study of 2018 editions. Politics in Central Europe, 15(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.2478/pce-2019-0017

Minárik, P. (2020). Participatory budgeting and traditional participation in Czech municipalities. Slovak Journal of Political Sciences. https://doi.org/10.34135/sjps.200102

Pheni, C. (2005). Keuangan daerah, investasi, dan desentralisasi. Kemitraan Partnership.

Pristiandaru, D. L. (2022). Daftar negara maju dan negara berkembang di dunia. Kompas.Com. https://internasional.kompas.com/read/2022/02/05/143000070/daftar-negara-maju-dan-negara-berkembang-di-dunia

Rahmawati, S. M., & Supriatono, B. (2019). Implementasi penganggaran partisipatif di Indonesia. Jurnal SIKAP (Sistem Informasi, Keuangan, Auditing Dan Perpajakan), 4(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.32897/jsikap.v4i1.150

Salahudin, S. (2012). Korupsi, demokrasi dan pembangunan daerah. LAPINDA BIDOS NTB.

Shah, A. (2007). Participatory budgeting. Public sector governance and accountability. World Bank.

Souza, C. (2001). Participatory budgeting in Brazilian cities: limits and possibilities in building democratic institutions. Environment and Urbanization, 13(1), 159–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780101300112

Sukardi, A. (2009). Participatory governance dalam pengelolaan keuangan daerah. LaksBang.

Surbakti, R. (2005). Memahami ilmu politik. Grasindo.

Wampler, B. (2020). Participatory budgeting: Core principles and key impacts. Journal of Deliberative Democracy, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.16997/jdd.138

Wu, Y., & Wang, W. (2012). Does participatory budgeting improve the legitimacy of the local government?: A comparative case study of two cities in China. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 122–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2012.00771.x

Zakariya, R. (2020). Partisipasi masyarakat dalam pencegahan korupsi dana desa: Mengenali modus operandi. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i2.670