The implementation of whistleblowing in political parties to prevent corruption crimes
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Political parties are an important element of democracy. Ethical standards, accountability, and the culture of party democracy all require attention. This study examines the implementation of a whistleblowing system in political parties and its effectiveness in preventing corruption. The data was obtained through interviews and observations were processed into formulating descriptive solutions. The outcome is a system developed by the authorial team called SIAPP (Political Party Information and Complaint System). SIAPP is a digital platform owned by political parties containing information about anti-corruption work and education schemes, interactive community access, and information surrounding complaints. The SIAPP can support the implementation of the Political Party Integrity System Module (SIPP) launched by the KPK RI. Political parties need to be transparent so that the public knows of anti-corruption work schemes, ethical standards for party cadres, and the culture of party democracy. The study results state that political parties and anti-corruption activists agree with the SIAPP mechanism offered because it is felt to be quite effective in preventing political corruption and could encourage party transparency to gain public trust.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Agustina, H., & Sutarih, A. (2019). Corruption of regional heads in indonesia; anatomy, causative factors, and solutions. Proceedings of the Proceedings of the 1st Asian Conference on Humanities, Industry, and Technology for Society, ACHITS 2019, 30-31 July 2019, Surabaya, Indonesia, December 2018. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.30-7-2019.2287759
Barnes, T. D., & Cassese, E. C. (2017). American party women. Political Research Quarterly, 70(1), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912916675738
Binns, R. (2017). Fairness in machine learning: Lessons from political philosophy. Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency, PMLR, 81, 1–11.
Bohnenberger, K. (2020). Money, vouchers, public infrastructures? A framework for sustainable welfare benefits. Sustainability, 12(2), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020596
Buscaglia, E., & van Dijk, J. (2003). Controlling organized crime and public sector corruption: Preliminary results of the global trends study. Forthcoming in Forum. Vienna: United Nations, 4–35.
Djamba, Y. K., & Neuman, W. L. (2002). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Teaching Sociology, 30(3), 380. https://doi.org/10.2307/3211488
Dussuyer, I., Mumford, S., & Sullivan, G. (n.d.). Reporting corrupt practices in the public interest: innovative approaches to whistleblowing. Handbook of Global Research and Practice in Corruption,. Handbook of Global Research and Practice in Corruption, eds, Graycar, A. and Smith, R. Edward Elgar.
Gidron, N., & Ziblatt, D. (2019). Center-right political parties in advanced democracies. Annual Review of Political Science, 22, 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-090717-092750
Indrati, & Farida, M. (2007). Ilmu Perundang-Undangan. Kanisius.
Istifadah, R. U., & Senjani, Y. P. (2020). Religiosity as the moderating effect of diamond fraud and personal ethics on fraud tendencies. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Finance Research, 2(1), 91. https://doi.org/10.21580/jiafr.2020.2.1.4712
Larasati, E., Karnati, N., & Muhab, S. (2022). The effect of servant leadership, compensation, professional development on the performance of state elementary school teachers in West Jakarta. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review, 5(3), 260–270. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v5i3.220
Lewis, J. (2017). Social impacts of corruption upon community resilience and poverty | Lewis | Jàmbá: Journal of Disaster Risk Studies. Jàmbá - Journal of Disaster Risk Studies, 9(1), 1996–1421.
Megawati, M., & Absori, A. (2019). The authority of decision making of the people’s consultative assembly based on the values of people’s sovereignty in Indonesia. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 10(2), 265–276.
Najih, M. (2018). Indonesian penal policy: Toward Indonesian Criminal Law reform based on Pancasila. Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies, 3(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v3i02.27510
Rinaldy Bima, M., & Ramadani, R. (2020). Position of Supervisory Board Organ and Its Implications for the Institutional Corruption Eradication Commission. Law Reform, 16(2), 179–197.
Saud, M., & Margono, H. (2021). Indonesia’s rise in digital democracy and youth’s political participation. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 18(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2021.1900019
Sullivan, S. (2017). What’s ontology got to do with it? Nature, knowledge and ‘the green economy.’ In Journal of Political Ecology (Vol. 24).
Susanto, S. (2020). E-court as the prevention efforts against the Indonesia judicial corruption. Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 9(1), 116. https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.41127
Wiratraman, H. P. (2019). The challenges of teaching comparative law and socio-legal studies at Indonesia’s Law Schools. Asian Journal of Comparative Law, 14(S1), S229–S244. https://doi.org/10.1017/asjcl.2019.15
Yanto, O., Rusdina, E., Sari, N. W., & Pujilestari, Y. (2019). The Role Of Indictment Of Public ProsecutorIn Eradication Of The Case Of CorruptionIn Indonesian Criminal Justice System”. Rechtidee, 14(2), 274–282.