Politisasi Senat Akademik dan Relasinya dengan Konflik Kepentingan dan Perilaku Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi

Main Article Content

Lucky Lhaura Van F.C
Afred Suci
Charles Simabura
Alexsander Yandra
Emy Sadjati
Adrian Faridhi
Prama Widayat

Abstract

Studies about the politization of academic senate at higher education institutions in corruption control and prevention system are scarce. Framed by collective action, power balance, and bureaucratic transparency theories, this research aims to examine the effect of power imbalance due to double position of structural and academic senate leaders, and the dominance of ex-officio elements regarding to conflict of interests and corruptive behavior. The result reveals, the conflict of interests elicited by the power imbalance generated corruptive behavior in HEIs, especially in terms of policy corruption. In practical terms, nepotism and transactional patterns were the most common acts of corruption.


 


Abstrak


Studi terkait politisasi senat akademik dalam sistem pengawasan dan pencegahan korupsi di perguruan tinggi masih sangat jarang dilakukan. Sehingga, penelitian ini bertujuan menguji dampak ketidakseimbangan kekuasaan akibat praktik rangkap jabatan pimpinan struktural dengan pimpinan senat akademik, dan dominasi unsur ex-officio dalam komposisi senat akademik terhadap konflik kepentingan dan perilaku korupsi di perguruan tinggi. Teori yang digunakan adalah teori tindakan kolektif, keseimbangan kekuasaan dan transparansi biro-krasi, Pengumpulan data dilakukan secara daring dan dianalisis menggunakan teknik des-kriptif, t-test, ANOVA, mediasi dan moderasi Hayes PROCESS. Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan, konflik kepentingan akibat ketidakseimbangan kekuasaan menyebabkan munculnya perilaku koruptif di perguruan tinggi, khususnya di ranah kebijakan. Sedangkan di ranah praktis, nepotisme dan pola transaksional menjadi dua perbuatan korupsi yang paling sering terjadi di perguruan tinggi.

Article Details

How to Cite
Van F.C, L. L., Suci, A., Simabura, C., Yandra, A., Sadjati, E., Faridhi, A., & Widayat, P. (2022). Politisasi Senat Akademik dan Relasinya dengan Konflik Kepentingan dan Perilaku Korupsi di Perguruan Tinggi. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(2), 373–391. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i2.840
Section
Articles

References

Bai, B., Liu, X., & Kou, Y. (2014). Belief in a just world lowers perceived intention of corruption: The mediating role of perceived punishment. PLoS ONE, 9(5), e97075. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0097075

Chapman, D. W., & Lindner, S. (2016). Degrees of integrity: the threat of corruption in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2014.927854

Daniel, J. (2016). Combatting corruption and enhancing integrity: A contemporary challenge for quality and credibility in higher education. Advisory Statement for Effective International Practice.

Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015). Higher education reform in Italy: Tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 215–234. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2014.6

Dorasamy, N. (2013). Good governance and whistleblowing: A case of a Higher Education Institution (HEI) in South Africa. Journal of Social Sciences, 34(2), 105–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/09718923.2013.11893122

Fenster, M. (2015). Transparency in search of a theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 18(2), 150–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431014555257

Fleming, P. (2021). Dark academia: How universities die. Pluto Press.

Ghufron, N. (2014). Whistleblower dalam sistem peradilan pidana (T. Herlambang (ed.)). https://repository.unej.ac.id/handle/123456789/62759

Hamilton, A., Madison, J., & Jay, J. (2009). The federalist papers. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300161045

Hapsari, A. N. S., & Seta, D. W. (2019). Identifikasi kecurangan dan whistleblowing universitas. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 7(1), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v7i1.15424

Hayes, A. F. (2017). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. Guilford publications.

Hood, C. (2007). What happens when transparency meets blame-avoidance? Public Management Review, 9(2), 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030701340275

Kirya, M. (2019). Corruption in universities: Paths to integrity in the higher education subsector. U4: Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, 10.

Light, D. W. (2013). Strengthening the theory of institutional corruptions: Broadening, clarifying, and measuring. SSRN Electronic Journal, 2. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2236391

Marquette, H., & Peiffer, C. (2015). Collective action and systemic corruption. ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops.

Martin, M. (2016). External quality assurance in higher education: how can it address corruption and other malpractices? Quality in Higher Education, 22(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2016.1144903

Meier, B. (2004). Corruption in the education sector: An introduction (pp. 1–12). Transparency International.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 139 Tahun 2014 tentang Pedoman Statuta dan Organisasi Perguruan Tinggi, Pub. L. No. 139 (2014).

Milad, M. K., Wibowo, A. T., & Athoillah, A. Y. (2019). Penguatan tata kelola transparansi informasi publik, akuntabilitas, dan efisiensi keuangan di universitas demi mewujudkan good university government. OECONOMICUS Journal of Economics, 3(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.15642/oje.2019.3.2.220-233

Munzhedzi, P. H. (2017). The role of separation of powers in ensuring public accountability in South Africa: Policy versus practice. The 2nd Annual Conference on ‛‛ The Independence of African States in the Age of Globalisation”. http://hdl.handle.net/10386/1882

Novelino, A. (2021). Korupsi meluas, Mahfud minta kampus punya peran pencegahan. CNN Indonesia. https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20210527094110-12-647269/korupsi-meluas-mahfud-minta-kampus-punya-peran-pencegahan

Nurunnabi, M. (2016). Political governance and (account)ability of private universities in developing countries. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 29(6), 522–544. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPSM-09-2014-0112

Olson, M. (1989). Collective action. In The Invisible Hand (pp. 61–69). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-20313-0_5

Osipian, A. L. (2009). Corruption hierarchies in higher education in the former Soviet Bloc. International Journal of Educational Development, 29(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2008.08.006

Persson, A., Rothstein, B., & Teorell, J. (2013). Why anticorruption reforms fail-systemic corruption as a collective action problem. Governance, 26(3), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01604.x

Piecuch, T., Chudy-Laskowska, K., & Jankowska-Mihułowicz, M. (2020). Conditions of corruptive behavior – the example of Poland and Ukraine (P. Maresova, P. Jedlicka, K. Firlej, & I. Soukal (eds.); pp. 623–633). https://doi.org/10.36689/uhk/hed/2020-01-071

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2008 tentang keterbukaan informasi publik, Pub. L. No. 14 (2008). https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/39047/uu-no-14-tahun-2008

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 4 Tahun 2014 tentang Penyelenggaraan Pendidikan Tinggi dan Pengelolaan Perguruan Tinggi, Pub. L. No. 4 (2014).

Putra, A. (2017). Menguatkan tata kelola transparansi informasi publik di perguruan tinggi. INTEGRITAS: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 3(1), 173. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v3i1.161

Salahudin, S., Nurmandi, A., Fajar, M., Mutiarin, D., Siregar, B., Sulistyaningsih, T., Jainuri, J., Agusta, R., & Karinda, K. (2019). Developing integrity university governance model in Indonesia. International Journal of Higher Education, 8(5), 185. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v8n5p185

Seniwoliba, J. A., & Boahene, B. E. (2015). Manifestation of corruption in higher education: the role of the University administrator. Research Journal of Educational Studies and Review, 1(3), 78–88. http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/344

Smith, E., & Williams-Jones, B. (2009). Legalistic or inspirational? Comparing university conflict of interest policies. Higher Education Policy, 22(4), 433–459. https://doi.org/10.1057/hep.2009.3

Sofyani, H., Abu Hasan, H., & Saleh, Z. (2021). Internal control implementation in higher education institutions: determinants, obstacles and contributions toward governance practices and fraud mitigation. Journal of Financial Crime, ahead-of-p(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-12-2020-0246

Suci, A. (2017). Penjaminan mutu perguruan tinggi: Dilema politik organisasi dan urgensi penggunaan profesional eksternal. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 3(2), 215–222. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v3i2.202

Suci, A., Maryanti, S., Van FC, L. L., & Yandra, A. (2020). Dilema ex-officio terkait pencegahan korupsi dan penjaminan mutu di perguruan tinggi swasta. Jurnal Penjaminan Mutu, 6(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.25078/jpm.v6i1.1169

Thomas, A. (2009). Internal governance imperatives for universities. African Journal of Business Ethics, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.15249/4-1-62

Transparency International. (2013). Global corruption barometer 2013. Transparency International. https://www.transparency.org/en/publications/global-corruption-barometer-2013

Vanni, F. (2014). The role of collective action. In Agriculture and Public Goods (pp. 21–37). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7457-5_2

Wessels, J. S., & Sadler, E. (2021). Conflict of interest: The case of a non-decision-making committee at a South African public higher education institution. The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 17(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.4102/td.v17i1.878

West, P. W. A. (2006). Conflict in higher education and its resolution. Higher Education Quarterly, 60(2), 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2273.2006.00316.x

Wijayanti, A., & Selawati, B. A. (2020). Perbaikan kebijakan tata kelola perguruan tinggi kedinasan. Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi, 6(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v6i1.583

Wiryadi, A., & Sebrina, N. (2013). Pengaruh asimetri informasi, kualitas audit, dan struktur kepemilikan terhadap manajemen laba. Wahana Riset Akuntansi, 1(2), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.24036/wra.v1i2.2577