Noken and corruption: Degradation of cultural anti-corruption values in the era of special autonomy in Papua

Main Article Content

Bonefasius Bao
PRT. Paramma
Anitha Nurak
Hendrik Vallen Ayomi

Abstract

In the past, Indigenous Papuans had a unique way of teaching their cultural values of hard work, honesty, openness, and authority. These values are contained in the Noken. Noken is a handicraft product made from natural materials which has the same function as a bag. It is used to fill crops, groceries, and personal items and is used in ceremonies as a souvenir and an accessory for women. The philosophy of the Noken is full of values, including transparency and integrity, wherein Papuans were taught an anti-corruption culture from their early life. This contradicts the current situation, where corruption practices are increasing, especially among public officeholders. This study aims to analyse the degradation of Papua’s anti-corruption culture after the implementation of special autonomy by using a qualitative perspective, namely gathering information from selected informants through focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. The results of this study indicate that the causes of the degradation of the anti-corruption culture are due to changes in consumptive lifestyles and weak supervision, a high-cost political system, and convoluted bureaucratic flows. The consequence of this degradation is the fading of Noken-based anti-corruption culture, dependence on special autonomy funds, and the sharpening of social conflicts. For this reason, political action and goodwill from stakeholders are needed to revitalise Noken's noble values through internalising said values in social life.

Article Details

How to Cite
Bao, B., Paramma, . P., Nurak, A., & Ayomi, H. V. (2023). Noken and corruption: Degradation of cultural anti-corruption values in the era of special autonomy in Papua. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v9i1.984
Section
Articles

References

Aji, M. R., & Hantoro, J. (2022). KPK layangkan peringatan ke tersangka kasus korupsi Gereja Kingmi Mimika. TEMPO.CO. https://nasional.tempo.co/read/1599364/kpk-layangkan-peringatan-ke-tersangka-kasus-korupsi-gereja-kingmi-mimika

Amrullah, A., & Putra, E. P. (2022). Peneliti duga ada unsur suap, minta KPK usut proses pembentukan DOB Papua. Republika. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/rf1mu3484/peneliti-duga-ada-unsur-suap-minta-kpk-usut-proses-pembentukan-dob-papua

Ayomi, H. V., & Paramma, P. (2021). Gereja dan korupsi: Analisis isi khotbah (content analysis) terkait praktek korupsi di Papua. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 7(1), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v7i1.734

Hariyani, H. F., Priyarsono, D. S., & Asmara, A. (2016). Analisis faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi korupsi di kawasan Asia Pasifik. Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Kebijakan Pembangunan, 5(2), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.29244/jekp.5.2.2016.32-44

Januar, A. (2017). Fungsi, makna, dan eksistensi noken sebagai simbol identitas orang Papua. Patra Widya: Seri Penerbitan Penelitian Sejarah Dan Budaya., 18(1), 57–70.

Kriyantono, R. (2020). Teknik praktis riset komunikasi kuantitatif dan kualitatif. Prenadamedia Group.

Latupeirissa, J. J. P., Wijaya, I. P. D., & Suryawan, I. M. Y. (2021). Problematika pelaksanaan kebijakan otonomi khusus kepada daerah Papua dan Papua Barat dengan perspektif kebijakan publik. Sawala : Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 9(2), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v9i2.3496

Marit, E. L. (2016). Noken dan perempuan Papua: Analisis wacana gender dan ideologi. MELANESIA: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Sastra Dan Bahasa, 1(1), 33–42.

Muhlizi, A. F. (2014). Membangkitkan budaya nusantara yang anti korupsi. Rechtsvinding, 1–6.

Mustholih, M. (2019). KPK sebut Sumut provinsi terkorup di Indonesia. Media Indonesia. https://mediaindonesia.com/nusantara/229265/kpk-sebut-sumut-provinsi-terkorup-di-indonesia

Nazamuddin, N. (2018). Dana otsus rawan korupsi. Indonesia Corruption Watch. https://antikorupsi.org/id/article/dana-otsus-rawan-korupsi

Pona, L. (2016). Fenomena korupsi di Papua. Leutikabooks.

Pujileksono, S. (2015). Metode penelitian komunikasi kualitatif. Kelompok Intrans Publishing.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, (1945).

Ridwan, A. (2016). Komunikasi antarbudaya: mengubah persepsi dan sikap dalam meningkatkan kreativitas manusia. Pustaka Setia.

Rozie, F. (2020). Ketua KPK ungkap 26 provinsi terlibat korupsi, Jabar paling banyak. Liputan 6. https://www.liputan6.com/news/read/4387134/ketua-kpk-ungkap-26-provinsi-terlibat-korupsi-jabar-paling-banyak

Suharyo, S. (2018). Otonomi khusus di Aceh dan Papua di tengah fenomena korupsi, suatu strategi penindakan hukum. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(3), 305–318. https://ejournal.balitbangham.go.id/index.php/dejure/article/view/466

Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Staff Papers, 45(4), 559–594. https://doi.org/10.2307/3867585

Tutoroong, C. E., Rachman, S. J., Alamsyah, W., & Sahputri, W. U. (2021). Potret pengadaan barang/jasa di wilayah Papua dan Papua Barat. Indonesia Corruption Watch.

Warikar, J. (2022). Implementasi otonomi khusus di Provinsi Papua (Studi kasus otonomi pendidikan). Universitas Gadjah Mada. https://etd.repository.ugm.ac.id/penelitian/detail/218522