Analysis of the effect of corruption prevention on private investment at the district/city level in Indonesia

Main Article Content

Maruli Tua
Benedictus Raksaka Mahi


: Several previous studies have shown that there are differences in the effect of corruption prevention on private investment. Corruption eradication by the KPK is expected to have a positive and significant effect on investors' decisions when investing in Indonesia. This research studied the long-term effects of corruption prevention on accumulated private investment at the regional level, using cross-sectional data analysis from 507 districts and cities between 2018-2020. The test was conducted using multiple linear regression with the independent variable being the Monitoring Center for Prevention (MCP) as the corruption prevention index. Using White Robust estimator, the study results prove that corruption prevention has long-term positive and significant effects on overall accumulated investment at the district and city levels. The MCP score of a region was greater than other regions for three years, therefore the accumulated investment was greater. These results encourage an increase of urgency when mainstreaming corruption prevention, proving it to be the right choice for investment in Indonesia. To enable local governments to be involved in corruption eradication, the government is expected to provide sustainable local incentive funds (DID).

Article Details

How to Cite
Tua, M., & Mahi, B. R. . . (2022). Analysis of the effect of corruption prevention on private investment at the district/city level in Indonesia. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 8(2), 247–258.


Abidin, M. Z. (2015). Tinjauan atas kebijakan dana insentif daerah dalam mendukung kinerja pemerintahan provinsi dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Civil Service Journal, 9(1).

Ahdiyana, M. (2009). Memperkuat manajemen strategis dengan pengukuran kinerja dalam organisasi sektor publik. Jurnal Ekonomi UNY, 1–14.

Aysan, A. F., Nabli, M. K., & Véganzonès-Varoudakis, M.-A. (2007). Governance institutions and private investment: An application to the Middle East and North Africa. The Developing Economies, 45(3), 339–377.

Azfar, O. (2007). Disrupting corruption. In Performance accountability and combating corruption (pp. 255–283). World Bank Washington DC.

Badan Pusat Statistik. (2021). Keadaan angkatan kerja di Indonesia Agustus 2021.

Barnett, A. G., Pols, J. C. van der, & Dobson, A. J. (2005). Regression to the mean: what it is and how to deal with it. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34(1), 215–220.

Camargo, C. B. (2011). Accountability for better healthcare provision: A framework and guidelines to define understand and assess accountability in health systems (10). Basel Institute on Governance.

de Asis, M. G. (2000). Reducing corruption at the local level. The World Bank.

Dunning, J. H. (1994). Reevaluating the benefits of foreign direct investment. University of Reading, Department of Economics New York, NY.

Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Dzhumashev, R. (2009). Is there a direct effect of corruption on growth? Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Globerman, S., Shapiro, D., & Tang, Y. (2006). Foreign direct investment in emerging and transition european countries. In J. A. Batten & C. Kearney (Eds.), Emerging European Financial Markets: Independence and Integration Post-Enlargement (Vol. 6, pp. 431–459). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Hayat, A. (2019). Foreign direct investments, institutional quality, and economic growth. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 28(5), 561–579.

Huntington, S. P. (2006). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2009). Governance matters VIII: aggregate and individual governance indicators, 1996-2008. In World bank policy research working paper (No. 4978).

Klitgaard, R. (1988). Controlling corruption. University of California Press.

Leff, N. H. (1964). Economic development through bureaucratic corruption. American Behavioral Scientist, 8(3), 8–14.

Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712.

Mengistu, A. A., & Adhikary, B. K. (2011). Does good governance matter for FDI inflows? Evidence from Asian economies. Asia Pacific Business Review, 17(3), 281–299.

Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503.

Nelson, R. R., & Phelps, E. S. (1965). Investment in humans, technological diffusion and economic growth (419).

Nguyen, C. H. (2020). Labor force and foreign direct investment: Empirical evidence from Vietnam. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 103–112.

North, D. C. (1991). Institutions. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5(1), 97–112.

North, D. C. (1992). Transaction costs, institutions, and economic performance. ICS Press San Francisco, CA.

Peres, M., Ameer, W., & Xu, H. (2018). The impact of institutional quality on foreign direct investment inflows: evidence for developed and developing countries. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 31(1), 626–644.

Pindyck, R., & Rubinfeld, D. (2018). Macroeconommics, (Global edition). Pearson Education.

PriceWaterhouseCoopers. (2022). PwC’s US investor survey: The economic realities of ESG.

Schwab, K. (2017). The global competitiveness report 2017-2018. World Economic Forum.

Transparency International. (2009). The anti-corruption plain language guide. Transparency International Berlin.

Williamson, O. E. (2002). The theory of the firm as governance structure: from choice to contract. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(3), 171–195.

Zhao, J. H., Kim, S. H., & Du, J. (2003). The impact of corruption and transparency on foreign direct investment: an empirical analysis (1). Management International Review, 43(1), 41–63.