Application of restorative justice and corruption practices

Main Article Content

Iqbal Felisiano
Amira Paripurna

Abstract

This study aims to analyse the application of restorative justice as an alternative to punitive measures when settling criminal cases at the police level. It also seeks to identify potential forms of corruption in the application of restorative justice relating to criminal acts. This study uses socio-legal research with an emphasis on law implementation, particularly regarding  the handling of criminal cases by law enforcement agencies, especially the police. Police environment, especially in the East Java region; victims and perpetrators of crimes whose cases were resolved by a restorative justice mechanism, namely victims of cases of domestic violence, abuse, and theft; Community leaders involved in the process of settling cases with a restorative justice mechanism. To complete the interview, a Focus Group Discussion (FGD) was held involving academics, practitioners and civil society organisations, consisting of the Centre for Human Rights Law Studies, Kontras, LBH Surabaya, Indonesian Corruption Watch Malang, the Surabaya Children’s Crisis Centre, and legal professionals. The results of this study indicate that in practice there are a number of vulnerabilities to corruption that are not in line with the ideal values of restorative justice. The function of a mediator, carried out by investigators, is vulnerable to abuse due to the disharmony of arrangements, lack of oversight mechanisms, and the interests of the litigants. Corrupt behaviour arises through the "buying and selling" of cases, which can be resolved through the process of restorative justice. Victim-Offender Mediation and Family and Community Group Conference are restorative justice models which can be used.

Article Details

How to Cite
Felisiano, I., & Paripurna, . A. (2023). Application of restorative justice and corruption practices. Integritas : Jurnal Antikorupsi, 9(1), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.32697/integritas.v9i1.986
Section
Articles

References

Alfarizi, M. K. (2022). Kabareskrim sebut 15 ribu perkara diselesaikan dengan restorative justice. Tempo.Co.

Arief, H., & Ambarsari, N. (2018). Penerapan prinsip restorative justice dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 10(2), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.31602/al-adl.v10i2.1362

Atalim, S. (2013). Keadilan restoratif sebagai kritik inheren terhadap pengadilan legal-konvensional. Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional, 2(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v2i2.155

Djuhriyadi, M. (2020). Terapkan restorative justice, kejaksaan bantu kurangi penumpukan perkara di pengadilan. Independasi.Com.

Efendi, T. (2014). Dasar-Dasar hukum acara pidana. Malang: Setara Press.

Flora, H. S. (2018). Keadilan restoratif sebagai alternatif dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana dan pengaruhnya dalam sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. University Of Bengkulu Law Journal, 3(2), 142–158. https://doi.org/10.33369/ubelaj.3.2.142-158

Pangaribuan, L. M. P. (2009). Lay judges dan hakim ad hoc: suatu studi teoritis mengenai sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Universitas Indonesia, Fakultas Hukum, Pascasarjana.

Prasetyo, C. A. (2020). Analisis yuridis putusan nomor 34/Pid. Sus/TPK/PN. Jkt. Pst yang mengesampingkan putusan pra peradilan nomor 40/Pid. Pra/2018/PN. Jkt. Sel dikaitkan dengan KUHP. Novum: Jurnal Hukum, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.2674/novum.v7i4.32859

Prayitno, P. (2012). Penyelesaian kasus tindak pidana penganiayaan sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 351 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) KUHP jo Pasal 352 melalui restorative justice di wilayah Polresta Pontianak. Jurn Al Nestor Magister Hukum, 2(2).

Purba, J. (2017). Penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana bermotif ringan dengan restorative justice. Jala Permata Aksara.

Simanjuntak, S. D. A. (2022). Survei LSI: korupsi di kepolisian dan kejaksaan masih buruk. Kabar24.Bisnis.Com.

Usman, H. (2011). Analisis perkembangan teori hukum pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 2(1), 43258.

Walker, N. (1962). Morality and the criminal law. How. J. Penology & Crime Prevention, 11, 209.

Wilhelmus, O. R. (2018). Korupsi: teori, faktor penyebab, dampak, dan penanganannya. JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Katolik, 17(9), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.34150/jpak.v17i9.44